Nuvoco Vistas Corporation LTD Through Its Authorized Signatory Subhadeep Bhowmik vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through The Secretary Cum Commissioner Commercial Taxes Deptt

WPC/5166/2019HC JharkhandGSTCNR JHHC01032454201909 January 2020Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN3 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that since the issue involved in the present writ applications had already been dealt with and decided elaborately in its previous judgment dated 28.08.2019, passed in W.P.(T) No. 6048 of 2017 and analogous matters, there was nothing further to decide. The Court reiterated that the Circular dated 11.10.2017, which formed the basis for denying the issuance of Form-'C' to the petitioners for their purchases of high-speed diesel for manufacturing processes, had been quashed in the prior judgment. Consequently, the Court directed the State Government to issue Form-'C' to the petitioners for the purchases of high-speed diesel made by them for their manufacturing processes. The petitioners were also to be governed by the directions and observations made in Paragraphs 27 and 28 of the Court's judgment dated 28.08.2019.

Facts

The petitioners, Nuvoco Vistas Corporation Ltd. and ACC Limited, are engaged in manufacturing and mining activities and are bulk purchasers of high-speed diesel (HSD) for their operations. Their end products are not classified as 'goods' under Section 2(d) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act), but HSD used in their manufacturing process is. The State of Jharkhand issued a Circular dated 11.10.2017, denying the issuance of Form-'C' for items defined as 'goods' under Section 2(d) of the CST Act, including HSD. This denial was based on the premise that with the introduction of GST from 01.07.2017, dealers dealing in goods other than six excluded items were no longer liable under the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act (JVAT Act), leading to the automatic termination of their JVAT registration. This led to several writ applications, including the present ones, concerning the denial of Form-'C' for HSD purchases.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Circular dated 11.10.2017 issued by the State of Jharkhand, denying the issuance of Form-'C' for high-speed diesel purchased for manufacturing activities, is valid in light of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime? The petitioners argued that the Circular dated 11.10.2017, which denied them Form-'C' for high-speed diesel, is invalid. They contended that this denial was based on the premise that their JVAT registration had ended with the introduction of GST. However, they pointed out that this very Circular and the underlying reasoning had been addressed and quashed by this Court in a previous judgment dated 28.08.2019 in W.P.(T) No. 6048 of 2017 and analogous matters. Therefore, they submitted that nothing remained to be decided other than directing the State to issue Form-'C' to them, consistent with the previous ruling. The respondents (State of Jharkhand) did not present any arguments against the petitioners' claims, as the issue was stated to have been decided by this Court in a prior judgment.

Sections Cited

Section 2(d), Section 9(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

W.P.(T) No.5166 of 2019
W.P.(T) No.5820 of 2019

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No.5166 of 2019

Nuvoco Vistas Corporation Ltd. Jojobera Cement Plant, Jamshedpur.

.... Petitioner

With W.P.(T) No.5820 of 2019

ACC Limited, Chaibasa Cement Works,

Jhinkpani, District West Singhbhum.

…. Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Ranchi.

2.

Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Admn.), Jamshedpur.

3.

Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Jamshedpur Urban Circle, Jamshedpur.

4.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi.

5.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Delhi.

6.

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, through its General Manager, East Zone, Kolkata.

7.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (Marketing Division), through its General Manager, Rajbandh Terminal, Rajbandh, Durgapur, Burdwan (West Bengal) …. Respondents

(In both cases)

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Jharkhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.