M/S N V Impex Through Its Proprietor Parag Nathalal Haria vs. State Of Gujarat

SCA/17775/2021HC GujaratGSTCNR GJHC24063550202112 January 2022Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA,HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, M/s N V Impex, through its proprietor Parag Nathalal Haria, filed a writ-application before the Gujarat High Court. The petitioner challenged a Notice dated 14.10.2021, issued by Respondent No.2 (State Tax Officer, Jamnagar) under Section 44 of the VAT Act. This notice was directed to the Branch Manager of South Indian Bank Ltd., Jamnagar, and sought to attach the petitioner's Cash Credit Account No.0713083000000008. The petitioner sought to quash this notice and requested permission to operate the attached account pending the petition's final hearing. The State of Gujarat was the respondent.

Held

The Court noted that the law is well-settled that a cash credit account of an assessee cannot be provisionally attached in exercise of powers under Section 83 of the GST Act. During the hearing, the learned AGP produced a communication from the State Tax Officer, Jamnagar, to the Branch Manager of South Indian Bank Limited, informing that the cash credit account of the writ-applicant be defreezed at the earliest. In view of this development, the Court found that nothing further was required to be adjudicated. The writ-application was disposed of on this basis, without delving into the specifics of the VAT Act provision under which the notice was issued or the merits of the attachment itself, as the attachment was being withdrawn.

Key Issues

1. Whether a cash credit account of an assessee can be provisionally attached under Section 83 of the GST Act? The petitioner argued that the law is well-settled that such accounts cannot be attached under Section 83 of the GST Act. The revenue did not present any arguments on this point as recorded in the judgment. The judgment does not explicitly state which provision of the VAT Act was relied upon for the attachment, but the petitioner's challenge is framed in the context of GST provisions. The primary issue revolves around the legality of attaching a cash credit account under the relevant tax legislation.

Sections Cited

Section 83, Section 44

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
C/SCA/17775/2021 ORDER DATED: 12/01/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17775 of 2021 ================================================================ M/S N V IMPEX THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR PARAG NATHALAL HARIA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ================================================================ Appearance: MR APURVA N MEHTA, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR VIJAY H PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR UTKARSH SHARMA, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2 ================================================================ CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE Date : 12/01/2022

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)

By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs : “(A)

Your Lordships may be pleased to admit and allow this petition; (B)

Your Lordships may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gujarat High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.