Ms Kay Kay Construction vs. Union Of INDIA

WPMS/2163/2024HC UttarakhandGSTCNR UKHC01012468202405 September 2024Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the writ petition is not maintainable on the ground of an alternate remedy being available. The State counsel's submission that the order passed under Section 73(9) of the Uttarakhand GST Act is appealable under Section 107 of the same Act was found to have substance. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the appropriate forum, which is the appellate authority as provided under Section 107 of the Uttarakhand GST Act. The Court did not delve into the merits of the order passed under Section 73(9) or any specific arguments raised by the petitioner concerning the validity of that order. The ratio decidendi is that High Courts will generally not entertain writ petitions when a clear and effective alternate statutory remedy exists, especially in tax matters where such remedies are specifically provided.

Facts

The petitioner, represented by Mr. Rajveer Singh, filed a writ petition challenging an order passed under Section 73(9) of the Uttarakhand GST Act on July 12, 2023. The respondents included the Union of India, the State of Uttarakhand, and respondent no. 3. The petitioner sought to challenge the aforementioned order through the writ jurisdiction of the High Court. The State counsel pointed out that the order under challenge is appealable under Section 107 of the Uttarakhand GST Act, suggesting an alternative statutory remedy was available to the petitioner.

Key Issues

1. Whether the writ petition is maintainable when an alternate statutory remedy of appeal is available under Section 107 of the Uttarakhand GST Act? Petitioner's Arguments: The petitioner approached the High Court by way of a writ petition, presumably seeking to bypass the appellate route. Specific arguments from the petitioner regarding the maintainability of the writ petition or the merits of the order under challenge are not recorded in the judgment. Revenue/State's Arguments: The learned State Counsel argued that the order impugned in the writ petition is appealable under Section 107 of the Uttarakhand GST Act. This submission formed the basis for the Court's decision regarding the availability of an alternate remedy.

Sections Cited

Section 73(9), Section 107

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2024:UHC:6401 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No. 2163 of 2024 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. 1. Mr. Rajveer Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the Union of India. 3. Mr. Tarun Lakhera, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 4. Ms. Shakshi Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sobhit Saharia, learned counsel for respondent no. 3. 5. In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged an

order passed under Section 73(9) of Uttarakhand GST Act. The said order was passed on 12.07.2023. 6. Learned State Counsel submits that the order impugned in this writ petition is appealable under Section 107 of Uttarakhand GST Act.

7.

This Court finds substance in the said submission.

8.

Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternate remedy with liberty to petitioner to approach appropriate forum.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)

05.09.

2024 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signe

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Uttarakhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.