Ms Ashan Khan Contractor vs. Assistant Commissioner State Goods And Service Tax

WPMB/815/2025HC UttarakhandGSTCNR UKHC01015310202529 October 2025Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. NARENDAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY3 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court held that the Office Order dated 10.08.2022 clarified that prior to 18.07.2022, the exigible rate of taxation for works executed in favour of the Central Government, State Government, and Local Authority was 12%. The Office Order further stated that amendments made by Notification No.03/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13 July, 2022, with effect from 18th July, 2022, withdrew the concessional rate of 12% and set the applicable rate at 18% (9% CGST + 9% SGST) on construction services covered under specific serial numbers of Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The Court found an apparent error on the face of the record regarding the assessment at 18% if the work was executed before 18.07.2022. The Court resolved the issue by reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a rectification application under Section 161 of the GST Act, 2017, within 15 days of receiving the order. The Assessing Officer was directed to consider and dispose of this application within 15 days thereafter.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Ashan Khan Contractor, challenged the GST assessment order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, State Goods & Services Tax, Kashipur. The petitioner contended that the Assessing Officer assessed their tax dues at 18%. However, the petitioner argued that for works executed in favour of the State Government during the relevant period, a concessional rate of 12% should have been applied. The revenue, represented by the learned Standing Counsel, was directed to secure instructions. Subsequently, the Court was presented with an Office Order dated 10.08.2022, which clarified the applicable GST rates.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner was entitled to a concessional GST rate of 12% on works executed in favour of the State Government, as contended by the petitioner, or if the applicable rate was 18% as assessed by the respondent? Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that during the relevant assessment period, a concessional rate of 12% was applicable for works executed in favour of the State Government, and therefore, the assessment at 18% was erroneous. Respondent's Contention: The respondent, through the learned Standing Counsel, initially sought instructions. Subsequently, an Office Order dated 10.08.2022 was placed before the Court, which indicated amendments to the GST rate notifications.

Sections Cited

Section 161

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2025:UHC:9505-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. G. NARENDAR AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY Writ Petition (M/B) No. 815 of 2025 29th October, 2025 M/s Ashan Khan Contractor ---Petitioner Versus The Assistant Commissioner State Goods & Services Tax, Kashipur ---Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Dr. Govind Singh Latwal and Mr. Ravindra Singh Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioner Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder for the State (through V.C.) --------------------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT : (per Sri G. Narendar, C.J.)

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Department.

2.

The short issue canvassed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Assessing Officer while assessing the tax dues of the petitioner has assessed it @ 18% and that during the relevant assessment year, a concessional rate was levied in respect of works executed in favour of the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Uttarakhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.