Surya Build Creations vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax

WPMB/179/2026HC UttarakhandGSTCNR UKHC01004207202631 March 2026Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY3 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court agreed with the view taken by the Andhra Pradesh High Court that filing of NIL returns is not a ground contemplated under Sub-Section (2) of Section 29 of the GST Act for cancellation of registration. Consequently, the Court held that the impugned show cause notice and the order passed in pursuance thereof, which cancelled the petitioner's registration on this ground, could not survive. The Court's reasoning was that the statutory provision for cancellation of registration did not include the act of filing NIL returns as a permissible ground. Therefore, the cancellation order was quashed. The ratio decidendi is that a GST registration cannot be cancelled solely on the basis of filing NIL returns, as this is not a ground provided for in Section 29(2) of the Act. The writ petition was allowed, and the registration cancellation order was quashed.

Facts

The petitioner, Surya Build Creations, filed a writ petition challenging a show cause notice dated January 29, 2025, and the subsequent order dated February 17, 2025, which cancelled its GST registration. The cancellation was based on the ground of "filing NIL return since last two years." The petitioner argued that filing NIL returns is not a statutory ground for cancellation of registration. The respondents are the Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax, and another authority.

Key Issues

1. Whether filing NIL returns for two consecutive years constitutes a valid ground for cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2) of the GST Act? The petitioner contended that Section 29(2) of the GST Act enumerates specific circumstances under which registration can be cancelled, and filing NIL returns is not among them. The petitioner relied on the Andhra Pradesh High Court's judgment in Kali Shanker Enterprises vs. Additional Commissioner, Goods and Service Tax Officer, which supported this interpretation. The respondents did not record any arguments in the judgment.

Sections Cited

Section 29

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2026:UHC:2257-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY 31st March, 2026 Writ Petition (M/B) No. 179 of 2026 Surya Build Creations ------Petitioner Versus Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax, and another -----Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Ashish Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder for the State/respondents.

JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)

1.

The present petition has been filed for quashing the show cause notice dated 29.01.2025 and the order passed in pursuance thereof dated 17.02.2025 cancelling the registration of the petitioner firm on the ground; “filing NIL return since last two years”.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that filing of NIL return could not be a ground under the statute for cancelling the registration. He has invited our attention towards Section 29 of GST Act which invests power in the proper officer to cancel the registratio

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Uttarakhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.