M/S.Smart Agencie vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

WP(MD)/27939/2024HC MadrasGSTCNR HCMD01124001202417 December 2024Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU4 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court did not delve into the merits of the case or the alleged violations of natural justice. The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed. No order as to costs was made. The specific findings on the legality of the order or the violation of natural justice were not recorded as the petition was withdrawn by the petitioner.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Smart Agencie, represented by its Managing Partner S. Baskar, filed a writ petition before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. The petition challenged an order passed by the respondent, The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Rock Fort Assessment Circle. The impugned order was issued in Form GST DRC-07, with Reference No. ZD330623107246Q, pertaining to the tax period April 2021 to March 2022. The petitioner sought to quash this order, alleging it was illegal and passed in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. They further prayed for a direction to the respondent to re-do the assessment afresh after providing an opportunity for a personal hearing.

Key Issues

1. Whether the impugned order passed by the respondent, in Form GST DRC-07, Reference No. ZD330623107246Q, for the tax period April 2021-March 2022, is illegal and passed in gross violation of the Principles of Natural Justice, as contended by the petitioner? Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that the order was passed in gross violation of the Principles of Natural Justice, implying that they were not afforded a proper opportunity to be heard before the order was passed. They sought to quash the order and have the assessment re-done with a personal hearing. Respondent's Contention: The judgment records no specific contention from the respondent. The matter was resolved based on the petitioner's submission.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.12.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and W.M.P(MD)Nos.23701 & 23703 of 2024 M/s.Smart Agencie, Represented by its Managing Partner S.Baskar, 36/7, Ramamoorthy Nagar, Melachinthaman, Tiruchirappalli District – 620 002. ... Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Rock Fort Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, Trichy Town, Tiruchirappalli District.

... Respondent Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent vide her proceedings in Form GST DRC-07, Reference No : ZD330623107246Q, GSTIN/ID 33ACQFS6043K1ZP, Tax Period APR-2021-MAR-2022, dated 23.06.2023 and quash the same as it is illegal and passed in gross 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis violation of Principles of Natural Justice and further direct the respondent to re-do the assessment afresh after providing us an opportunity of personal hearing as per the provisions of the GST Act, 20

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.