M/S. Mps Pari Construction vs. The State Tax Officer V
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, M/s. MPS Pari Construction, filed a writ petition challenging an assessment order dated 05.06.2024 passed by the first respondent (State Tax Officer – V) and a summary order dated 05.06.2024 in Form GST DRC-07 passed by the second respondent (Commercial Tax Officer). The petitioner contended that these orders were passed for the assessment year 2023-2024 without providing sufficient opportunity, violating the principles of natural justice. The respondents argued that a show cause notice in DRC 01 was issued on 16.03.2024 and that the petitioner had an alternative appeal remedy under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017.
Held
The Court noted the submission by the learned Government Advocate that the petitioner has an appeal remedy before the Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST Appeal), Tiruchirapalli, under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. The Court directed that if an appeal is filed within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order, the appellate authority shall entertain it without reference to the period of limitation. The appellate authority is further directed to dispose of the appeal in accordance with law within three months thereafter. The Court did not decide on the merits of the petitioner's claim regarding the violation of natural justice.
Key Issues
1. Whether the assessment order and summary order were passed in gross violation of the principles of natural justice due to insufficient opportunity provided to the petitioner? (Question of law and fact, turning on principles of natural justice and procedural fairness under the GST Act, 2017). Petitioner's Argument: The assessment order for the year 2023-2024 was passed without providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, thus violating the principles of natural justice and rendering the impugned order liable to be set aside. Respondents' Argument: A show cause notice in DRC 01 was issued to the petitioner on 16.03.2024, indicating that due process was followed. The petitioner has an available statutory appeal remedy under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017, and should have availed it instead of approaching the High Court directly.
Sections Cited
Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: and
This writ petition is filed as against the assessment order passed by the first respondent herein for the assessment year 2023-2024 and its summary order passed by the second respondent, dated 05.06.2024. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order of assessment for the year 2023-2024 has been passed without providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, which according to the petitioner, is in violation to the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the order impugned in this writ petition, is liable to be set aside. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Mr.J.K.Jayaselan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that the impugned assessment order has been passed after issuing show cause notice in DRC 01 to the petitioner on 16.03.2024 and therefore, there is no need to interfere with the impugned order. He further submits that the petitioner is having an appeal remedy before the Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST Appeal), Tiruchirapalli, under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017. However, without invoking the appeal remedy, the petitioner has straightaway approached this Court.
Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate that the petitioner is having an appeal remedy before the Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST Appeal), Tiruchirapalli, under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017, this writ petition is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority and raise all the grounds raised in this writ petition in the appeal. In the event, if any appeal is filed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the appellate authority shall entertain the appeal without reference to the period of limitation and dispose of the same in accordance with ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis law, within a period of three months thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. NCC : Yes / No
2025 Index : Yes / No (2/2) smn2 To:- 1.The State Tax Officer – V, (Roving Squad), Commercial Taxes Buildings, Office of the Joint Commissioner (ST) (Int.), Tiruchirapalli District - 620 020. 2.The Commercial Tax Officer, Trichy, Commercial Taxes Buildings, Office of the Joint Commissioner (ST) (Int.), Tiruchirapalli District - 620 020. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
, J.
smn2
2025 (2/2) ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.