O.S.Hameed Sons vs. Deputy State Tax Officer St 2

Original PDF →
WP(MD)/11165/2025HC MadrasGSTCNR HCMD01045833202523 April 2025Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, O.S. Hameed & Sons, represented by its partner S. Navas Ahamed, filed a writ petition challenging an assessment order dated January 22, 2025, passed by the Deputy State Tax Officer, Nagercoil. The assessment pertains to the year 2020-2021. The petitioner contends that the assessment order was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice, as they were not afforded sufficient opportunity to submit a reply to the notice and participate in a personal hearing. The respondent argued that a show cause notice was issued on November 25, 2024, followed by reminders, and that the petitioner has an alternative appellate remedy under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017.

Held

The Court noted the submission by the learned Government Advocate that the petitioner has an appellate remedy before the Deputy Commissioner (ST) (Appeal), Tirunelveli, under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to raise all grounds raised in the writ petition before the appellate authority. The appellate authority was directed to entertain the appeal if filed within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order, without reference to the period of limitation, and to dispose of the appeal in accordance with law within three months thereafter. The Court did not decide on the merits of the petitioner's claim regarding the violation of natural justice or the legality of the assessment order.

Key Issues

1. Whether the assessment order dated January 22, 2025, passed by the respondent is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, and in violation of the principles of natural justice, as contended by the petitioner? The petitioner argues that the assessment was made without providing sufficient opportunity to submit a reply and attend a personal hearing, thus violating natural justice. The respondent contends that a show cause notice was issued on November 25, 2024, followed by reminders, and that the petitioner has an available appeal remedy under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017, and therefore, the writ petition should not be entertained. The respondent did not explicitly argue against the violation of natural justice but rather pointed to the procedural steps taken and the availability of an appeal.

Sections Cited

Section 107

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Before: and

This writ petition is filed as against the assessment order passed by the respondent dated 22.01.2025 for the assessment year 2020-2021. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order of assessment for the year 2020-2021 has been passed without providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, which according to the petitioner, is in violation to the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the order impugned in this writ petition, is liable to be set aside.

3.

Mr.J.K.Jayaselan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submits that the impugned assessment order has been passed after issuing show cause notice in DRC 01 to the petitioner on 25.11.2024, followed by subsequent reminders, dated 04.12.2024, 16.12.2024 and 06.01.2025 and therefore, there is no need to interfere with the impugned order. He further submits that the petitioner is having an appeal remedy before the Deputy ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Commissioner (ST) (Appeal), Tirunelveli, under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017. However, without invoking the appeal remedy, the petitioner has straightaway approached this Court.

4.

Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate that the petitioner is having an appeal remedy before the Deputy Commissioner (ST) (Appeal), Tirunelveli, under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017, this writ petition is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority and raise all the grounds raised in this writ petition in the appeal. In the event, if any appeal is filed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the appellate authority shall entertain the appeal without reference to the period of limitation and dispose of the same in accordance with law, within a period of three months thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. NCC : Yes / No

23.04.

2025 Index : Yes / No sm

____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis VIVEK KUMAR SINGH

, J.

sm To:-

1.

The Deputy State Tax Officer ST - 2, Nagercoil - 2 Mead Street, Nagercoil 629 001 Kanyakumari District.

23.04.

2025 ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.