M/S. R P Travels vs. The State Tax Officer
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, M/s. R P Travels, represented by its Proprietor, filed a writ petition before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. The petition challenged an assessment order dated 23.08.2024, passed by the respondent, the State Tax Officer, Madurai (Rural) East Assessment Circle. The petitioner contended that the assessment order for the year 2019-2020 was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice, specifically without providing sufficient opportunity to be heard. The respondent argued that a show cause notice was issued on 23.05.2024, followed by a reminder, and that the petitioner had an alternative appeal remedy under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017.
Held
The Court acknowledged the respondent's submission that the petitioner has an appeal remedy available before the Deputy Commissioner (ST) (Appeal), Madurai, under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appellate authority. The Court directed that the appeal should be entertained by the appellate authority without reference to the period of limitation if filed within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order. The appellate authority was further directed to dispose of the appeal in accordance with the law within three months thereafter. The Court did not decide on the merits of the petitioner's claim regarding the violation of natural justice.
Key Issues
1. Whether the assessment order dated 23.08.2024, passed by the respondent, is illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of the principles of natural justice, particularly Section 75(4) of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, due to insufficient opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner? Petitioner's contention: The assessment order was passed without providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, violating the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the order is liable to be set aside. Respondent's contention: A show cause notice was issued on 23.05.2024, followed by a reminder on 19.08.2024, indicating that sufficient opportunity was provided. The petitioner has an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017, and should have availed it instead of approaching the High Court directly.
Sections Cited
Section 75(4), Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: and
This writ petition is filed as against the assessment order passed by the respondent dated 23.08.2024 for the assessment year 2019-2020. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order of assessment for the year 2019-2020 has been passed without providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, which according to the petitioner, is in violation to the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the order impugned in this writ petition, is liable to be set aside.
Mr.J.K.Jayaselan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submits that the impugned assessment order has been passed after issuing show cause notice in DRC 01 to the petitioner on 23.05.2024, followed by subsequent reminder, dated 19.08.2024 and therefore, there is no need to interfere with the impugned order. He further submits that the petitioner is having an appeal remedy before the Deputy Commissioner (ST) (Appeal), Madurai, under ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017. However, without invoking the appeal remedy, the petitioner has straightaway approached this Court.
Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate that the petitioner is having an appeal remedy before the Deputy Commissioner (ST) (Appeal), Madurai, under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017, this writ petition is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority and raise all the grounds raised in this writ petition in the appeal. In the event, if any appeal is filed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the appellate authority shall entertain the appeal without reference to the period of limitation and dispose of the same in accordance with law, within a period of three months thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. NCC : Yes / No
2025 Index : Yes / No (2/2) To:- The State Tax Officer, Madurai (Rural) East Assessment Circle, Commercial Tax Buildings,Madurai. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
, J.
sm (2/2) 23.04.2025 ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.