Ms Cholayil Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax

WPMB/426/2026HC UttarakhandGSTCNR UKHC01009081202604 June 2026Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY3 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that while granting more time was within the Department's discretion, the haste shown in passing the impugned order was wholly unwarranted. The Court noted that the petitioner had applied for more time on the day following the receipt of the show-cause notice to gather necessary documents and prepare a response. Consequently, the Court quashed the order dated 15.04.2026. The petitioner was granted two weeks to file their reply along with relevant documents to the show-cause notice dated 09.04.2026. Following this, the Department was permitted to pass a fresh order on the petitioner's refund application. The ratio decidendi is that administrative authorities must act with reasonable dispatch and not exhibit undue haste, especially when a party seeks a legitimate extension to present their case, thereby ensuring principles of natural justice are upheld.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Cholayil Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 15.04.2026, issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax. The petitioner had applied for a refund of accumulated Input Tax Credit on 24.02.2026. The Department issued a show-cause notice on 09.04.2026, requiring a reply within four days. The petitioner, on 10.04.2026, requested more time to submit a reply and relevant documents. Despite this, the impugned order rejecting the refund request was passed on 15.04.2026. The revenue stated it had not received instructions from the Department.

Key Issues

1. Whether the respondent authority erred in rejecting the petitioner's request for further time to reply to the show-cause notice and proceeding to pass an order within four days, thereby acting with unwarranted haste? The petitioner argued that the respondent erred in rejecting the request for further time and passing the order immediately after four days. The petitioner contended that they had applied for an extension on the very next day of receiving the show-cause notice to collect relevant documents and file a proper reply. The revenue stated that it had not been provided with instructions by the Department.

Sections Cited

None explicitly mentioned in the judgment text provided.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2026:UHC:4478-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 04TH JUNE, 2026 WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 426 OF 2026 M/s Cholayil Pvt. Ltd. …...Petitioner. Versus Assistant Commissioner Central Goods and Services Tax ….Respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. G. Natrajan, Mr. Akash Deep and Mr. Yuvraj Singh, learned counsel. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel.

JUDGMENT :(per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The petitioner, feeling aggrieved by order dated 15.04.2026, issued by the respondent along with Form GST RFD-06, has filed the present writ petition.

3.

The petitioner had, by application dated 24.02.2026, claimed refund of accumulated Input Tax Credit. A show-cause notice was issued to the petitioner firm by the Department on 09.04.2026 as to why its application should not be rejected. It was thereby given four days’ time to reply. On the very next day, i.e. 10.04.2026, the petitioner firm filed application seeking more time so that it could respond to the

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Uttarakhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.