Sainik Mining And Allied Services LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA
Held
The Court held that a comprehensive procedure has been prescribed for the redressal of grievances concerning the non-uploading of FORM TRAN-1 due to technical glitches, as detailed in the circular dated April 3, 2018. The Court noted that this circular, particularly paragraph 8, provides a mechanism for taxpayers who encountered IT-related glitches and could not complete the TRAN-1 filing by the stipulated date. The Court found that this circular and the appointment of Nodal Officers by the State Government were sufficient to address the petitioner's grievance. Therefore, the Court directed the petitioner to approach the Nodal Officer of Korba, Assistant Commissioner, State GST, Korba Circle-1, within four days with their representation and necessary documents. The Nodal Officer was instructed to consider and dispose of the representation following the procedure laid down in para 8 of the circular dated April 3, 2018, taking into account that the writ petition had been pending since April 11, 2018. The Court did not expressly leave any issue undecided.
Facts
The petitioner, Sainik Mining & Allied Services Ltd., a company registered under the Chhattisgarh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, sought to claim input tax credit (ITC) of ₹1,16,90,475/-. They were required to submit FORM GST TRAN-1 electronically under Rule 117 of the Chhattisgarh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, for transitional provisions. The petitioner claims to have punched in the required data before the extended deadline of December 27, 2017. However, upon attempting to submit the form, an error message appeared, preventing its final upload. Despite complaining to the authorities, the issue remained unresolved, leading the petitioner to file a writ petition seeking manual acceptance of their application, reopening of the portal, and grant of ITC.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to claim input tax credit (ITC) benefit under Rule 117 of the Chhattisgarh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, despite being unable to upload FORM GST TRAN-1 due to technical glitches? 2. Whether the existing mechanism for grievance redressal for technical issues on the GST portal is adequate to address the petitioner's grievance? The petitioner argued that they had completed the data entry for FORM TRAN-1 well before the deadline and that the failure to upload was solely due to technical errors on the GST portal. They contended that they should not be deprived of the ITC benefit they are otherwise entitled to. The respondents, including the Union of India and the State of Chhattisgarh, submitted that an IT grievance redressal mechanism had been established, including the appointment of Nodal Officers, to address such technical issues. They relied on a circular dated April 3, 2018, which outlined a procedure for resolving stuck TRAN-1 filings.
Sections Cited
Rule 117, Section 73, Section 129, Rule 86A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 AFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (T) No.79 of 2018 Sainik Mining & Allied Services Ltd., a company duly incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Old VT Centre, Gevra Project, Korba, Chhattisgarh, through its President, Shri Satish Kaidan, S/o Shri Umed Singh, aged about 53 years, Old VT Centre, Gevra Project, Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Versus
Union of India, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, 136-A, North Block, New Delhi
Goods and Service Tax Council, through its Chairman, Goods and Service Tax Council Secretariat, 5th Floor, Tower II, Jeevan Bharti Building, Janpath Road, Connaught Place, New Delhi
Commissioner of Central Tax, Goods and Services Tax, Central GST Bhawan, Dhamtari Road, Tikrapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Commissioner, State Tax, Goods and Services Tax, Raipur, Civil Liens, Near Raj Bhavan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Commercial Tax, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner: Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate. For Respondent No.1:
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Chhattisgarh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.