M/S Shree Radhemani Steels (A Partnership Firm) vs. State Of Chhattisgarh

WPT/248/2021HC ChhattisgarhGSTCNR CGHC01033711202115 December 2021Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY AGRAWAL2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the writ petition was premature. While the petitioner contended that a show-cause notice was not issued and the order was not supplied, the court's perusal of the annexed documents revealed that a notice dated 13.02.2020 was issued, to which the petitioner had filed a reply. Subsequently, another notice was issued on 14.05.2020, for which no reply was filed. A summary show-cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 was then issued on 26.06.2020 under Section 74 of the Act read with Rule 142 of the Rules, followed by a tax assessment order dated 01.09.2020. The Court observed that this assessment order is an appealable order under Section 107 of the Chhattisgarh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Since the petitioner had not availed the statutory remedy of appeal before the appellate authority, the writ petition filed directly before the High Court was considered premature. Therefore, the Court was not inclined to entertain the petition at that stage.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Shree Radhemani Steels, challenged an order dated 26.06.2020 and subsequent proceedings initiated by the respondent authorities. The petitioner contended that the order was passed without supplying a copy of it or issuing a show-cause notice as required by Section 74 of the Chhattisgarh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. However, the court perused the annexed documents, which indicated that a notice dated 13.02.2020 was issued by the Assistant Commissioner regarding discrepancies in returns for financial years 2017-2018, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020, specifically concerning claimed input tax credit against a bogus dealer. The petitioner had replied to this notice. A subsequent notice was issued on 14.05.2020 for the same discrepancies, to which no reply was filed. Consequently, a summary show-cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 was issued on 26.06.2020 under Section 74 of the Act read with Rule 142 of the Rules, followed by a tax assessment order dated 01.09.2020 imposing a total tax of Rs.37,93,343/-.

Key Issues

1. Whether the order dated 26.06.2020 and subsequent proceedings are liable to be quashed for non-compliance with Section 74 of the Chhattisgarh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, specifically the alleged non-issuance of a show-cause notice and non-supply of the order copy. (Petitioner's contention). The petitioner argued that the respondent authorities failed to supply a copy of the order dated 26.06.2020 and did not issue a show-cause notice as mandated by Section 74 of the Act, rendering all subsequent proceedings invalid. The respondents, through the court's perusal of documents, presented evidence of notices issued and a reply filed by the petitioner, followed by a summary show-cause notice and an assessment order, suggesting procedural compliance. The court also noted that the assessment order is appealable under Section 107 of the Act.

Sections Cited

Section 74, Rule 142, Section 107

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPT No. 248 of 2021 M/s Shree Radhemani Steels (A Partnership Firm) Having Its Office At 82/17, Radhemani Tower, Opposite Deshbandhu Press Complex, Nagar Nigam Colony, Agrasen Chowk, Raipur- 492001 Through Its Partner Namely Ankush Agrawal, Son Of Ashwani Kumar Agrawal, Aged Around 38 Years, R/o A-25, North Avenue Road, Choubey Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Pin- 492001, ---- Petitioner Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Chhattisgarh State Tax (Gst), North Block, Sector-19, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh,

2.

Commissioner Of Chhattisgarh, State Tax (Gst), North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Raipur, Commercial Tax, Raipur, Chhattisgarh,

3.

The Assistant Commissioner, Chhattisgarh State Tax, Circle-2, Raipur, Behind Raj Bhawan, Civil Line, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, ---- Respondents For Petitioner: Shri Hari Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondents/State: Shri Udhaw Sharma, G.A., on advance copy Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, J Order On Board 16/12/2021

1.

Challenge to this petition is the order dated 26.06.2020 and consequent upon the entire subsequent procee

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Chhattisgarh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.