Krishna Metal Industries Through Its Proprietor Manish Kumar Agarwal vs. State Of Gujarat
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioners, Vinayak Metal, approached the Gujarat High Court challenging the cancellation of their GST registration. The Assistant Commissioner, Ghatak-23, Ahmedabad, issued a show cause notice dated 01.11.2021 under Section 29 of the GGST Act, 2017, citing "Issues any invoice or bills without supply of goods and/or services in violation of the provisions of this Act, or the rules thereunder leading to wrongful availment of input tax credit or refund of tax." The petitioner replied on 09.11.2021, questioning the Assistant Commissioner's authority. Despite the petitioner appearing on their own, the Assistant Commissioner passed an order dated 18.01.2022 cancelling the registration, stating "No clarification against SCN is submitted." The petitioner argued the show cause notice lacked material particulars and the order was vague. Similar issues arose in connected writ applications.
Held
The Court held that the show cause notice dated 01.11.2021 was vague and lacked material particulars, failing to comply with the principles of natural justice. The impugned order dated 18.01.2022 was also found to be vague and non-speaking, as it did not refer to the contents of the show cause notice or the petitioner's response. The Court noted that cancellation of registration entails civil and penal consequences, necessitating adherence to procedural fairness. Consequently, the Court quashed and set aside the show cause notice and the consequential order of cancellation for all the writ applications. The Court also quashed similar notices and orders in connected matters (SCA No. 5482 of 2022 and SCA No. 5485 of 2022). The matters were remitted to the respondent for de novo proceedings in accordance with law, and the respective GST registrations were revived. The ratio decidendi is that vague show cause notices and non-speaking orders leading to cancellation of GST registration violate principles of natural justice and are liable to be quashed.
Key Issues
1. Whether the show cause notice dated 01.11.2021, issued under Section 29 of the GGST Act, 2017, is legally valid and sufficient in its particulars to warrant cancellation of GST registration? (Question of law and fact). The petitioner argued that the show cause notice was vague, bereft of material particulars, and did not stipulate a clear date for personal hearing, thus violating principles of natural justice. The petitioner also questioned the authority of the Assistant Commissioner to initiate such proceedings. The revenue contended that a reply was submitted and the matter was decided on merits. 2. Whether the order dated 18.01.2022, cancelling the GST registration, is a speaking order and complies with the principles of natural justice? (Question of law and fact). The petitioner argued that the order was cryptic, non-speaking, and failed to consider their objections, leading to a violation of natural justice. The revenue did not present arguments on this point.
Sections Cited
Section 29, Rule 22(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE)
Since the issues raised in all the captioned writ applications are the same, those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. All the C/SCA/5480/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 17/03/2022 writ applicants have approach this Court being aggrieved by the illegal action of respondent State Tax Officer seeking cancellation of registration under the Gujarat Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 ( In short, “the GGST Act, 2017”).
For the sake of convenience, the Special Civil Application No.5480 of 2021 is treated as the lead matter.
By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and or any iother appropriate writs, order or direction for calling of records of proceedings initiated pursuant to show cause notice dated 01.11.2021 and after perusing the same be pleased to quashed and set aside show cause notice dated 01.11.2021 and order dated 18.01.2022 passed thereon by Assistant Commissioner , Ghatak-23, Ahmedabad, and be further pleased to direct restoration of registration bearing number 24BJVPG7723B2Z7; (b) To pass an ex-parte ad interim order staying the operation, execution and implementation of the order dated
2022
bearing
reference
no. ZA240122075952F. (c) Grant such further and other interim releifs , as this Hon'ble Court may deem fir and proper in the present nature and circumstances of the case.”
The facts, which emerges from the record, are summarized as under:
1 The writ applicant is registered under the GGST Act, 2017 having its Unique identification No.24BJVPPG7723B2Z7. The writ applicant firm was served with a show cause notice dated 01.11.2021 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Ghatak-23, Ahmedabad, in Form GST REG. 17/31. The said show cause C/SCA/5480/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 17/03/2022 notice was issued in exercise of power conferred under Section 29 of the GGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 22(1) of the Rules, 2017 framed thereunder.
2 The show cause notice simply states the reason for issuance of the notice, which reads as under: “Issues any invoice or bills without supply of goods and/or services in violation of the provisions of this Act, or the rules thereunder leading to wrongf~ul availment of input tax credit or refund of tax.”
3 The writ applicant submitted its reply dated 09.11.2021 within the time period granted in the said notice questioning the authority of the Assistant Commissioner, to initiate proceedings for cancellation of registration.
4 It is the case of the writ applicant that though, the show cause notice called upon the writ applicant “to appear for personal hearing on the appointed date and time” failing which, the case was to be decided ex-parte on the basis of available record on merits, the said show cause notice was bereft of any material particulars and the same does even stipulated any next date of hearing for personal hearing.
5 It is the case of the writ applicant that in absence of proper intimation by the respondent authority, the writ applicant on his own appeared before the concerned Officer thereby drawing attention about the objections raised by the writ applicant. However, the Assistant Commissioner, Ghatak – 23, Ahmedabad, without considering the objections raised by the writ applicant, passed the order dated 18.01.2022 cancelling the registration of C/SCA/5480/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 17/03/2022 the writ applicant firm. The sole reason assigned by the Assistant Commissioner in the said order of cancellation reads thus:
“1. No clarification against SCN is submitted. So cancellation order u/s 29 read with rule 21 for cancellation of GSTN wef 10.09.2020 is send by RPAD bearing o/w no. 4828 dated 18.01.2022”
5 Being aggrieved by the aforesaid illegal action of the respondent authority cancelling the registration of the writ applicant firm, the writ applicant has approached this Court by way of present writ application.
We have heard Ms. Manvi Damle, the learned counsel appearing for the Nanavati & Co. for the writ applicants and Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, appearing on advance copy for the respondent authority.
Recently, this Court had an occasion to deal with the issue of the procedural lapse on behalf of the State Authorities while dealing with the matters related to cancellation of registration under the GGST Act, 2017. The present matters are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Aggrawal Dyeing and Printing Works decided on 24.02.2022 in Special Civil Application no. 18860 of 2021 and allied matters.
On bare perusal of the contents of the show cause notice as well as the impugned order, we find that the said show cause notice is absolutely vague, bereft of any material particulars and the impugned order is also vague and a non-speaking order. It cannot be disputed that with cancellation of registration, the dealer C/SCA/5480/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 17/03/2022 is liable to both civil and penal consequences. To say the least, the authority ought to have at least referred to the contents of the show cause and the response thereto, which was not done. Not only the order is non-speaking but cryptic in nature and the reason of cancellation not decipherable there from. In such circumstances, the Principles of natural justice stand violated and the order needs to be quashed as it entails penal and pecuniary consequences. We therefore, quash and set aside the show cause notice dated 01.11.2021 as well as the consequential order dated 18.01.2022. We also quash and set aside the show cause notice dated 11.10.2021 and consequential order dated 31.12.2021 cancelling registration in Special Civil Application No. 5482 of 2022 and show cause notice dated 16.11.2021 and consequential order dated 07.12.2021 in Special Civil Application No. 5485 of 2022. We further remit these matters to the respondent No.2 for denovo proceedings in accordance with law. In view of the fact that we have quashed the order of cancellation of GST registration, the respective GST registration stands revived.
It is expected of respondent Authority to abide by direction issued by this Court in Special Civil Application No.18860 of 2021 and allied matter. In light of the aforesaid, the matters stands as disposed in above terms. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) (NISHA M. THAKORE,J) Y.N. VYAS
Reproduced from the public record of the Gujarat High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.