M/S Gna Gears LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA And Another

CWP/9541/2017HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01107439201716 July 2018Bench: MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN,MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that a sum of ₹6,79,35,479/- had indeed been deposited by the petitioner by way of reversal of credit in their CENVAT credit account. Taking this amount into account, the actual outstanding demand from the petitioner was calculated to be ₹7,06,96,232/-. The Court directed the petitioner to deposit 7.5% of this reduced amount, ₹7,06,96,232/-, within a period of six weeks. Upon compliance, the CESTAT was ordered to hear the petitioner's appeal on its merits. The Court explicitly stated that no opinion was expressed on the merits of the case. The petition was disposed of with these directions.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s GNA Gears Ltd., challenged an order dated 05.04.2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The CESTAT had dismissed the petitioner's appeal due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement for entertaining the appeal. The petitioner manufactures motor vehicle parts and agricultural equipment. A demand of ₹13,86,31,711/- was raised against the petitioner for allegedly paying a lower duty rate on agricultural equipment. The petitioner had already reversed ₹6,79,35,479/- from its CENVAT credit account towards this demand. The petitioner argued that since approximately 50% of the demand was already paid, the 7.5% pre-deposit condition should be considered met.

Key Issues

1. Whether the CESTAT was justified in dismissing the petitioner's appeal for failure to deposit 7.5% of the demand, considering that a substantial portion of the demand had already been paid by way of reversal of CENVAT credit? Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that approximately 50% of the total demand of ₹13,86,31,711/- had already been paid by reversing credit in the CENVAT account. Therefore, the condition of pre-deposit of 7.5% should have been considered complied with, and the appeal should have been heard on its merits. They relied on the fact of substantial payment made. Respondents' contention: The respondents contended that the petitioner failed to deposit the mandatory 7.5% of the amount of demand raised. Consequently, the appeal was rightly dismissed for non-compliance with the prerequisite condition of deposit.

Sections Cited

None explicitly mentioned in the provided text as being discussed or interpreted, only the requirement of pre-deposit for appeal entertainment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision.16.07.2018 M/s GNA Gears Ltd. ...Petitioner Vs Union of India and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present: Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate for the respondents. -.- RAJESH BINDAL J.

Order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short, the Tribunal) dated 05.04.2017 dismissing the appeal of the petitioner on account of failure to deposit the amount required for entertainment of appeal, has been impugned by filing the present writ petition.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is engaged in manufacture of motor vehicle parts as well as agricultural equipments. He had paid duty @12% on motor vehicle parts, however, treating the agricultural equipments to be exempted, duty @6% was paid by way of reversal of credit in the CENVAT credit account. The authorities found that in fact, the duty was payable thereon @12%, hence, show cause notice was issued and demand of

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.