M/S Kahlon International vs. State Of Punjab And Another

CWP/7700/2019HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01037341201920 March 2019Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL,MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The High Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposed of the present writ petition. The Court directed respondent No.2 to take a decision on the petitioner's letter dated September 4, 2018, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. This decision must be made in accordance with the law and by passing a speaking order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The Court did not decide on the petitioner's entitlement to interest on the delayed VAT refund, leaving this substantive issue for respondent No.2 to adjudicate.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Kahlon International, engaged in manufacturing nuts and bolts, filed returns for financial years 2009-10, 2012-13, 2015-16, and 2016-17. The petitioner was entitled to Input Tax Credit (ITC) on purchases made within Punjab and applied for a refund of ` 28,49,484/-. After the refund was not processed, the petitioner filed CWP-14793-2018, which was disposed of on June 1, 2018, directing the respondent to decide the refund application. The refund amount was credited without interest. The petitioner then sent a letter on September 4, 2018, to respondent No.2 seeking interest on the delayed VAT refund, but received no response. This led to the filing of the present writ petition.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is legally entitled to interest on the delayed payment of VAT refund of ` 28,49,484/-, as per the relevant provisions of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005, and any applicable rules or circulars? The petitioner argued that they are entitled to interest on the delayed refund, having followed the prescribed procedure and having already secured the principal refund amount after a previous writ petition. The petitioner relied on their letter dated September 4, 2018, to respondent No.2 for claiming this interest. The respondents' arguments are not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

CWP-7700-2019 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7700-2019 Date of Decision: 20.3.2019 M/s Kahlon International, Ludhiana ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL. PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.

1.

Through the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to issue refund of ` 1,13,759/- on account of interest on the delayed payment of VAT refund of ` 28,49,484/-.

2.

The petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacturing of nuts and bolts. It filed the returns for the financial years 2009-10, 2012-13, 2015-16 and 2016-17 along with the annual statement. The petitioner deducted tax at source while making payments. It had to pay advance tax on the goods purchased from outside the State of Punjab on the purchases made within the State of Punjab and was entitled to Input Tax Credit (ITC) of the tax paid to the seller. Since the petitioner was entitled to refund, it applied for refund in

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.