Yash Pal Mehta vs. Superintendent (Anit Evasion) Central Goods And Services Tax

CRM-M/26085/2023HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01066422202304 September 2023Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY4 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court made the interim anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner absolute. The Court refrained from deciding the quantum of ITC involved, considering it a matter for trial, and noted that anticipatory bail was granted to a co-accused.

Facts

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the GST Act. The petitioner argued that the ITC amount was less than Rs. 5 crores, making the offense bailable, and that a co-accused was already on bail.

Key Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail, considering the alleged amount of ITC and the bail status of a co-accused.

Sections Cited

Section 132, Section 20

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

CRM-M-26085-2023

2023:PHHC:116116

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

202

CRM-M-26085-2023 Date of decision: 04.09.2023

Yash Pal Mehta

..Petitioner

Versus

Superintendent (Anti Evasion), Central Goods & Services Tax

..Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY

Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate and

Mr. Tej Bahadur, Advocate for the respondent.

*** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J.

1.

On 22.05.2023, this Court had passed the following order:- “Instant petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. praying for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case COMA/15650/2021 dated 29.11.2021 (Annexure P-1) titled as Superintendent versus Gurbax Lal & others under Section 132 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 read with Section 20 of the Integrated Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017. It has been contended by counsel for the petitioner that allegations against the petitioner are totally false and frivolous. He has submitted that ITC, as per the complaint, has been shown to be Rs.9,37,83,105/- but the same

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.