Ashok Sukhija vs. State Of Haryana

CRM-M/52902/2023HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01133913202319 December 2023Bench: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA7 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court granted bail to the petitioners, noting the significant delay in lodging the FIR, the case being primarily documentary, and the fact that a co-accused had already been granted bail. The applicability of IPC provisions was also considered debatable.

Facts

The FIR was registered based on a complaint alleging bogus refund claims of input tax credit by a firm using false documents. The petitioners, an alleged commission agent and an officer who passed the final assessment order, sought bail.

Key Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to regular bail given the delay, nature of evidence, and bail granted to a co-accused. Whether IPC provisions are applicable when a special act (VAT Act) governs the alleged offense.

Sections Cited

Section 439 CrPC, Section 173 CrPC, Section 406 IPC, Section 409 IPC, Section 419 IPC, Section 420 IPC, Section 465 IPC, Section 467 IPC, Section 468 IPC, Section 471 IPC, Section 120B IPC, Section 57 Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005, Section 58 Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

1.

CRM-M-52902-2023 2023: PHHC: 163131

**** ****

2.

CRM-M-56316-2023 2023: PHHC: 163132

**** MAHESH KUMAR @ MAHESH BANSAL

. . . . Petitioner Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA

. . . . Respondent

**** Reserved on:12.12.2023 Pronounced on: 19.12.2023 **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

**** Present: - Mr. Harpreet S. Rakhra, Advocate, for the petitioner (in CRM-M-52902-2023)

Dr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pratham Sethi, Mr. Kanishk Sarup, Advocates, for the petitioner (in CRM-M-56316-2023)

Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

By way of above titled two petitions, both filed under Section 439 CrPC, petitioners pray for grant for their release on regular bail in case FIR No.657 dated 24.10.2020, registered at Police Station City Sirsa, under Sections 406/409/419/42

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.