M/S S R Transports vs. The State Tax Officer
Held
The Court found that the respondent had provided sufficient opportunities and considered the petitioner's reply. The issue was determined to be factual in nature, which is not suitable for writ jurisdiction.
Facts
The petitioner challenged an order related to excess claim of input tax credit. The petitioner argued that their reply to the show cause notice was not properly considered. The respondent contended that the reply was considered and the petitioner failed to appear for a personal hearing.
Key Issues
Whether the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and whether the factual dispute can be adjudicated by the High Court in a writ petition.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 05.12.2025 passed by the respondent.
Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes not
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.