M/S. Daimler Financial Services vs. The State Of Karnataka

WP/10544/2017HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01002890201710 January 2018Bench: VINEET KOTHARI123 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the claim of input tax credit is indefeasible and cannot be denied based on the machinery provisions or time limitations. The machinery provisions of filing returns cannot defeat substantive claims under Section 10(3) of the Act.

Facts

The petitioners challenged reassessment orders that denied them input tax credit (ITC) for tax periods under the Karnataka Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act, 2003. The denial was based on the timing of invoice raising and the period in which the ITC was claimed.

Key Issues

Whether input tax credit can be denied solely based on the timing of invoice raising or the tax period in which it is claimed, despite it being a substantive right.

Sections Cited

Section 10(3), Section 35, Section 36(1), Section 39(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (11 matters)

W.P.Nos.28796/2016
W.P.Nos.34001/2016
W.P.No.36404/2016
W.P.Nos.55050/2016
W.P.Nos.8042/2017
W.P.No.8044/2017
W.P.Nos.8045/2017
W.P.Nos.8046/2017
W.P.Nos.8206/2017
W.P.Nos.12165/2017
W.P.Nos.27451/2017

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

1/123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2018

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI

W.P.Nos.58917-58928/2016, W.P.Nos.26349-26360/2017, W.P.Nos.27983-27994/2016, W.P.Nos.27995-28006/2016, W.P.Nos.28796/2016 & 28997 – 29007/2016, W.P.Nos.31159-31170/2016, W.P.Nos.31430-31441/2016, W.P.Nos.33906-33917/2016, W.P.Nos.34001/2016 & 36313-36323/2016, W.P.Nos.35703-35708/2016, W.P.No.36404/2016, W.P.Nos.37148-37159/2016, W.P.Nos.39369-39380/2016, W.P.Nos.46927-46938/2016, W.P.Nos.46927-46938/2016, W.P.Nos.46939-46950/2016, W.P.Nos.53182-53193/2016, W.P.Nos.55050/2016 & 58511-58521/2016, W.P.Nos.59250-59261/2016, W.P.Nos.4199-4210/2017, W.P.Nos.8042/2017 & 19016- 19062/2017, W.P.No.8044/2017, W.P.Nos.8045/2017 & 25845-25855/2017, W.P.Nos.8046/2017 & 25856- 25866/2017, W.P.Nos.8183-8194/2017, W.P.Nos.8206/2017 & 10601-10611/2017, W.P.Nos.11384- 11395/2017, W.P.Nos.11674-11685/2017, W.P.Nos.12165/2017 & 16929-16940/2017, W.P.Nos.20454-20465/2017, W.P.Nos.26337-26348/2017, W.P.Nos.26361-26372/2017, W.P.Nos.26779-26790/2017, W.P.Nos.26899-26910/2017, W.P.Nos.27451/2017 & R

Date of Judgment 10-01-2018 W.P.No

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.