M/S Sspdl Interserve PVT LTD vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes
Held
The Court held that the selling dealer was registered during the relevant tax periods. The disallowance of input tax credit solely on the ground of the selling dealer being de-registered was not acceptable. The matter was remitted for reconsideration.
Facts
The petitioner challenged a reassessment order and demand notice that disallowed input tax credit. The disallowance was primarily based on the selling dealer being considered de-registered during the relevant period.
Key Issues
Whether input tax credit can be disallowed if the selling dealer was registered during the period of transaction, and if the purchasing dealer has provided proof of tax payment.
Sections Cited
Section 39[1]
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE KVAT ACT, IN RELATION TO THE ASSESSMENT PERIOD 2014-15 DATED 30.04.2019 AND THE CONSEQUENTIAL DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED THERETO DATED 30.04.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND H RESPECTIVELY, IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO DIS-ALLOWANCE OF INPUT TAX CREDIT; AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.