M/S Bagadia Brothers vs. Additional Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes Zone - Ii
Held
The Court held that the Deputy Commissioner was authorized to commence re-assessment proceedings and that the burden of proving the correctness of input tax credit lies with the dealer claiming it. The appellant failed to discharge this burden.
Facts
The appellant claimed input tax credit on purchases from M/s. Tradex Metal Corporation. The Deputy Commissioner disallowed this credit, finding that M/s. Tradex Metal Corporation was a bill trader issuing fake bills. The first appellate authority allowed the appeal, but the Additional Commissioner (Revisional Authority) set aside that order, restoring the disallowance.
Key Issues
Whether the Deputy Commissioner had the authority to initiate re-assessment proceedings and whether the appellant discharged the burden of proof for claiming input tax credit.
Sections Cited
Section 39(1), Section 64(1), Section 70, Section 2(24), Section 62(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
DATED 09.02.2018 PASSED IN NO.ADCOM/ZONE-II/APP-3/SMR/CR-18/ 2017-18 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ZONE – II, 6TH FLOOR, VTK-1, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER BEARING NO.VAT.AP.1284 TO 1294/15-16 DATED 24.07.2017 PASSED BY JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, (APPEALS)- 3, BENGALURU – 27 FOR THE TAX PERIO
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.