Ripss Infrastructure PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax, Ludhiana And Others

CWP/37471/2019HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01156883201903 March 2020Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court decided to pass an order in this writ petition based on the order of even date passed in CWP No.37235 of 2019. Therefore, the holding and reasoning in this specific judgment are contingent upon the findings in the aforementioned connected case. The operative directions and the relief granted would be the same as in CWP No.37235 of 2019. Any issues expressly left undecided in the connected case would also be considered undecided here. The ratio decidendi would be derived from the decision in CWP No.37235 of 2019.

Facts

The petitioner, Ripss Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., through its Director Pardeep Kumar Aggarwal, filed a writ petition before the Punjab & Haryana High Court. The respondents are the Commissioner, Central Excise and Services Tax, Ludhiana, and others. The judgment does not specify the tax period(s) or the specific order or action under challenge, nor does it mention the authority that passed it. The amount in dispute is also not recorded. The procedural history that matters is the filing of this writ petition.

Key Issues

The Court had to decide the issues presented in CWP No.37235 of 2019, titled Gazebo Developers Pvt. Ltd. through its Manager Kapil Dev Singh Versus Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax, Ludhiana and others, as the present case was decided based on the order in that connected matter. The judgment does not explicitly frame the questions of law or mixed law and fact for this specific petition. The petitioner's arguments are not detailed in this excerpt. The respondents' arguments are also not recorded.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

216 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.37471 of 2019 Date of Decision: 03.03.2020 Ripss Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Pardeep Kumar Aggarwal Petitioner Versus Commissioner, Central Excise and Services Tax, Ludhiana and others Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present: Mr. Aman Garg, Advocate and Mr. G.S. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate for respondent No.

1.

Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. **** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) For order, see order of even date passed in CWP No.37235 of 2019 titled as Gazebo Developers Pvt. Ltd. through its Manager Kapil Dev Singh Versus Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax, Ludhiana and others.

[AJAY TEWARI] JUDGE [AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE March 03, 2020 pankaj baweja

1.

Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.03.05 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.