Madaan And Company vs. Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax And Others
Held
The Court held that the respondents had indeed failed to decide the petitioner's application for release of export incentives and refunds within a reasonable time. The Court noted the respondents' admission that the application should have been decided by the competent authority. Consequently, the Court directed the competent authority to decide the petitioner's application for the release of export incentives and other dues within a period of one month from the receipt of a certified copy of the order. This decision must be made in accordance with the law and by passing a speaking order. The Court did not leave any issue undecided.
Facts
The petitioner, Madaan & Company, filed a writ petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court challenging the respondents' inaction in releasing various export incentives and refunds due to the petitioner. The petitioner had submitted a representation/letter dated 21.12.2020 (Annexure P-7) in this regard. Despite the lapse of over seven months, this representation remained undecided. The respondents, represented by the Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax and Others, accepted that the application should have been decided by the competent authority.
Key Issues
1. Whether the respondents have failed to decide the petitioner's representation for release of export incentives and refunds within a reasonable time, thereby violating the petitioner's right to a timely decision? (Question of law) Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that their representation dated 21.12.2020, seeking release of export incentives and refunds, had been pending for over seven months without any decision, which is an unreasonable delay. Respondents' contention: The respondents, through their counsel, fairly accepted that the application should have been decided by the competent authority, implicitly acknowledging the delay.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
112
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH .-.
CWP-15862-2021 (O&M)
Date of decision : 18.08.2021
Madaan & Company
…. Petitioner
Vs.
Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax and Others
….Respondents.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present: Mr. Chatan Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL)
Taken up through video conferencing.
This petition has been filed against the action of the respondents in not releasing various export incentives and refund, which as per the petitioner are due to him.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in this connection he had made a representation/letter dated 21.12.2020 (Annexure P-7), but despite a lapse of more than 07 months even that representation/letter has not been decided.
Notice of motion.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. Anshuman Chopra, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and very fairly accepted that the application should have been decided by the competent authority.
TRIPTI SAINI 2021.08.19 11:32 I a
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.