M/S Dasmesh Weaving And Dyeing Mills PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors
Held
The Court held that the impugned orders dated June 3, 2020, and June 29, 2020, rejecting the petitioner's refund claim, were to be set aside. This decision was based on the concession made by the learned State Counsel that the petitioner's case needed reconsideration in light of the GST Council's Law Committee report dated February 17, 2021. The Court directed the respondent-competent Authority to decide the petitioner's refund applications (Annexures P-5 and P-7) in accordance with law. If the petitioner is found entitled, the refund is to be made. The entire exercise was ordered to be completed within four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order. No specific issues were expressly left undecided.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Dashmesh Weaving and Dyeing Mills Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated June 3, 2020, and June 29, 2020, which rejected its claim for a GST refund. The petitioner had relied on a report dated February 17, 2021, from the Law Committee of the GST Council. The respondents are the Union of India and others. The court also considered applications for early hearing and for placing additional documents on record, which were allowed.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner's claim for refund should be reconsidered in light of the GST Council's Law Committee report dated February 17, 2021? The petitioner argued that its case should be reconsidered based on this report. The respondents, through the learned State Counsel, fairly accepted that the petitioner's case ought to be reconsidered in view of the said report. No specific provisions of the GST Act were explicitly named in the arguments presented in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210 CM-14348-49-2021 in/and CWP-14925-2020 (O&M) Decided on : November 23rd, 2021 M/s Dashmesh Weaving and Dyeing Mills Pvt. Ltd. ....Petitioner VS Union of India and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Amar Pratap Singh, Advocate and Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surinder Daaria, Advocate for the respondents No.1, 3 to 8. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) CM-14348-CWP-2021 This application has been filed for early hearing of the main case.
For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowed and the main case is taken up on Board for hearing today itself. CM-14349-CWP-2021 This application has been filed for placing on record Annexures P- 15 to P-19.
For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowed and above-said documents are taken on record. Main case This writ petition has been filed challenging the orders dated 3.6.2020 and 29.6.2020 whereby the claim of the petitioner for refund was rejected. ANURADHA 2021.11.25 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and int
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.