Sunny Singhal vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax Intelligence, Rohtak

CRM-M/52164/2021HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01115584202120 October 2023Bench: MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court was asked to decide whether the impugned order dated 26th August, 2019, in criminal complaint No. 400 of 2019, filed under Section 132 of the GST Act, 2017, should be quashed or set aside. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the present petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The reasoning for the withdrawal was not elaborated upon in the judgment. As the main case was dismissed as withdrawn, any pending applications were rendered infructuous. The specific findings on the merits of the GST provisions or the validity of the order were not reached due to the withdrawal.

Facts

The petitioner, Sunny Singhal, filed a petition before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh seeking to quash or set aside an order dated 26th August, 2019, which was part of a criminal complaint No. 400 of 2019 dated 24th August, 2019. This complaint was filed under Section 132 of the GST Act, 2017. The respondent in the petition was the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Rohtak. The proceedings were conducted through video conferencing.

Key Issues

1. Whether the impugned order dated 26th August, 2019, in criminal complaint No. 400 of 2019 dated 24th August, 2019, under Section 132 of the GST Act, 2017, is liable to be quashed or set aside? The petitioner argued for quashing the order. The respondent's arguments were not recorded in the judgment.

Sections Cited

Section 132

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

209-2 2023:PHHC:137441 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-52164-2021 Date of decision: 20th October, 2023 Sunny Singhal ...Petitioner(s) Versus Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Rohtak ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present: Mr. Rajiv Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate for the respondent. *** AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral): The matter has been taken up through video conferencing.

1.

The present petition has been filed for quashing/setting aside the impugned order dated 26th August, 2019 in criminal complaint No. 400 of 2019 dated 24th August, 2019, under Section 132 of GST Act, 2017. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

Since the main case has been dismissed as withdrawn, pending application if any is rendered infructuous. [AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE 20th October, 2023 Parveen Sharma

1.

Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2023.10.21 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. High Court, Chandigarh

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.