L S Power Control Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA And Others
Facts
The petitioner, L.S. Power Control Private Limited, filed a Writ Petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, and the Department of Revenue. After arguing for some time, the petitioner's learned counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an Appeal under Section 107 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court also directed that if such an appeal is preferred, the concerned appellate authority shall decide it on its merits without delving into the question of limitation.
Held
The Court held that the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the Writ Petition. It was held that the petitioner should be granted liberty to file an Appeal under Section 107 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court further directed that if such an appeal is filed, the appellate authority shall decide the same on its merits, without considering the limitation period. The reasoning appears to be based on allowing the petitioner to pursue the available statutory remedy. The operative direction is to permit withdrawal with liberty to file an appeal, with the appellate authority to decide on merits, disregarding limitation.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to file an Appeal under Section 107 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? Petitioner's contention: The petitioner, through its counsel, argued for withdrawal of the writ petition and sought liberty to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal. Revenue's contention: The judgment records no specific argument from the revenue or state respondents regarding the withdrawal of the petition or the liberty to file an appeal.
Sections Cited
Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
106 IN TH
L.S. POWER
UNION OF FINANCE, OTHERS
CORAM: H
H
Present: M
M
f
* SANJEEV PR
A prays for with Section 107 th
G Petition stand petitioner, the merits withou
A accordingly.
August 8, 202 Ess Kay
Whether Whether R HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGAR C D R CONTROL PRIVATE LIMITE
INDIA THROUGH ITS SE DEPARTMENT OF REVE
[ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ (Through Video Conferencin
Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocate an Mr. Hritik Chaudhary and Mr. Su for the petitioner. (Appeared thro *** RAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) After arguing for some time, lea hdrawal of this Writ Petition with he Haryana Goods and Services Granting the liberty as aforesa ds dismissed as withdrawn. If su e same shall be decided by the c ut delving into the question of lim All pending applications filed in
[SANJ
24
[
speaking / reasoned
: Reportable
: AB AND HARYANA AT RH CWP-17034-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.08.2024 ED ..…...Petitioner V/s. ECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ENUE, NEW DELHI AND ….....Respondents
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.