Principal Commissioner, Goods And Services Tax Commissionerate, Ludhiana vs. M/S Garg Industries PVT LTD Ludhiana

CEA/2/2020HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01129201201923 October 2024Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court allowed the appeal to be withdrawn. The reasoning was based on the CBIC Circular dated 06.08.2024, which sets a minimum monetary threshold of Rs. 2 Crore for filing appeals before High Courts. The appellant's counsel submitted that this circular is applicable to pending cases. The Court accepted this submission and permitted the withdrawal. The ratio decidendi is that appeals filed by the revenue that do not meet the monetary threshold stipulated in the relevant CBIC circular are to be permitted to be withdrawn. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn. No issues were expressly left undecided.

Facts

The Principal Commissioner, Goods and Services Tax Commissionerate, Ludhiana (appellant) filed an appeal before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana against an order concerning M/s Garg Industries Pvt. Ltd. (respondent). The specific tax period and the order under challenge are not detailed in the judgment. The appeal was filed by the revenue. The procedural history indicates that the appeal was filed before the High Court. The respondent was not represented before the Court.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appeal filed by the appellant is maintainable in light of the Circular dated 06.08.2024 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC)? The appellant argued that the appeal should be withdrawn in view of the CBIC Circular dated 06.08.2024. This circular, issued under Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944, made applicable to Service Tax via Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, fixes a minimum monetary limit of Rs. 2 Crore for filing appeals before High Courts. The appellant contended that this circular is applicable to pending cases as well. The respondent did not present any arguments.

Sections Cited

Section 35R, Section 83

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

CEA-2-2020 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 236 CEA-2-2020 (O&M) Decided on : 23.10.2024 The Pr. Commissioner, Goods and Services Tax Commissionerate, Ludhiana . . . Appellant(s) Versus M/s Garg Industries Pvt. Ltd., Ludhiana . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for the appellant(s). None for the respondent(s). **** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

, J. (Oral)

1.

Learned counsel for the appellant prays to withdraw the present appeal in view of circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, Government of India dated 06.08.2024, whereby in exercise of powers under Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to the Service Tax vide Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs has fixed the minimum monetary limits of Rs.2 Crore for High Courts for the purpose of filing of appeals against the order of the CESTAT.

2.

Taking into consideration the circular dated 06.08.2024, which is applicable to pending cases also, we

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.