Ms Best Agrochem PVT LTD Now Ms Best Agrolife Ltdand Others vs. Union Of INDIA And Others
Facts
The petitioners, M/s Best Agrochem Pvt. Ltd. (now M/s Best Agrolife Ltd.) and others, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Union of India and others. The petitioners sought to withdraw the petition to pursue other available legal remedies, including filing an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, if they were so advised. The specific tax period(s), the order or action under challenge, the authority that passed it, and the amount in dispute were not recorded in the judgment.
Held
The Court permitted the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition. The reasoning provided was based on the submission of the petitioners' counsel, who sought to withdraw the petition to pursue alternative remedies, specifically mentioning the option to file an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court did not delve into the merits of the case or the underlying dispute. The ratio decidendi is that a petitioner can withdraw a writ petition to pursue statutory remedies, provided such withdrawal is permitted by the court. The operative direction was that the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioners should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition to avail other remedies, including filing an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? Petitioner's Argument: The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that they be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable them to avail such other remedies as shall be admissible in law, and to file an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, if so advised. Revenue/State's Argument: The judgment records no argument for the respondents.
Sections Cited
Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-4498-2025
Date of decision:18.02.2025
M/s Best Agrochem Pvt. Ltd. (now M/s Best Agrolife Ltd.) and others
….Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: Mr. Amit Jay Singh, Advocate, and
Mr. Savinder Singh Gill, Advocate, for the petitioners.
****
ARUN PALLI, J. (Oral)
Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioners to avail such other remedies, as shall be admissible in law, as also to file an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, if so advised.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(ARUN PALLI)
JUDGE
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA)
JUDGE 18.02.2025 Ak Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AMIT KUMAR 2025.02.18 19:43 I attest to t
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.