M S Radhe Enterprises And Another vs. Union Of INDIA And Others
Facts
The petitioners, M/s Radhe Enterprises and another, filed a writ petition (CWP-4503-2025) before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Union of India and others. The specific tax period(s), the order or action under challenge, the authority that passed it, and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the filing of the writ petition is also not detailed.
Held
The Court allowed the petitioners' request to withdraw the writ petition. The reasoning provided is that the learned counsel for the petitioners, having argued the matter at some length, submitted that he be permitted to withdraw the petition. This withdrawal was sought to enable the petitioners to avail other admissible remedies and to file an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, if they chose to do so. The Court's decision to dismiss the petition as withdrawn is based solely on the petitioner's submission and request. No specific findings on any substantive GST issues were made, as the petition was not adjudicated on merits. The ratio decidendi is that a party can withdraw a writ petition to pursue alternative remedies, including statutory appeals, if permitted by the court.
Key Issues
The Court had to decide whether to permit the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioners' counsel argued that they be allowed to withdraw the petition to pursue other remedies available in law, including filing an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, if they were so advised. The respondents' arguments are not recorded in the judgment.
Sections Cited
Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-4503-2025
Date of decision:18.02.2025
M/s Radhe Enterprises and another
….Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: Mr. Amit Jay Singh, Advocate, and
Mr. Savinder Singh Gill, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Anju Bansal, Advocate, for Mr. Sourabh Goel, Senior Standing Counsel, for the respondents.
****
ARUN PALLI, J. (Oral)
Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioners to avail such other remedies, as shall be admissible in law, as also to file an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, if so advised.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(ARUN PALLI)
JUDGE
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA)
JUDGE 18.02.2025 Ak Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportab
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.