M S Delta Chemicals And Another vs. Union Of INDIA And Others
Facts
The petitioners, M/s Delta Chemicals and another, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Union of India and others. The petitioners sought to withdraw the petition to pursue other remedies available in law, specifically mentioning the option to file an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The exact nature of the dispute, the tax period(s), the order or action under challenge, the authority that passed it, and the amount in dispute were not specified in the provided text.
Held
The Court allowed the petitioners' request to withdraw the writ petition. The reasoning was based on the petitioners' submission that they wished to pursue alternative remedies, including the statutory appeal mechanism provided under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court did not delve into the merits of the case or the underlying dispute. The operative direction was to dismiss the petition as withdrawn, leaving the petitioners free to pursue their chosen remedies.
Key Issues
The Court did not have to decide any substantive issues of law or fact. The primary question before the Court was whether to allow the petitioners' request to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioners argued that they wished to withdraw to avail other remedies, including filing an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017. The respondents' stance on the withdrawal was not recorded in the judgment.
Sections Cited
Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5656-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 28.02.2025 M/s Delta Chemicals and another … Petitioners Versus Union of India and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Amit Jay Singh, Advocate, and Mr. Savinder Singh Gill, Advocates, for the petitioners. Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Sr. Standing Counsel, and Ms. Sidhi Bansal, Advocate, for the respondent(s). *** ARUN PALLI, J. (Oral) Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioners to avail such other remedies, as shall be admissible in law, as also to file an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, if so advised. Dismissed as withdrawn. ( Arun Palli )
Judge 28.02.2025 Rajan ( Sudeepti Sharma ) Judge Whether speaking / reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO RAJAN KUMAR 2025.02.28 18:38 I am approving this document
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.