Ms Citizen Industries vs. Union Of INDIA And Others

CWP/32577/2025HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01176867202509 December 2025Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's submission that a final order under Sections 74 and 122 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, had been passed during the pendency of the writ petition. The Court granted the petitioner the liberty to file a fresh writ petition to challenge this subsequent order. The Court explicitly clarified that its decision to allow the withdrawal and grant liberty to file a fresh petition did not involve any expression of opinion on the merits of the matter or the maintainability of the original writ petition. The operative direction was to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Citizen Industries, filed a writ petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court. During the pendency of this writ petition, a final order was passed on December 08, 2025, under Sections 74 and 122 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the current writ petition with the liberty to file a fresh one challenging the newly passed final order. The respondents included the Union of India and others.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the subsequent order passed under Sections 74 and 122 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that since a final order has been passed during the pendency of the writ petition, it would be appropriate to withdraw the current petition and file a fresh one to challenge the said order. Revenue's contention: The judgment does not record any specific argument from the revenue or state respondents on this issue. However, the court ultimately granted the petitioner's request.

Sections Cited

Section 74, Section 122

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

134-c IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-32577-2025

Date of Decision: December 09, 2025

M/s Citizen Industries

.....Petitioner

Versus Union of India and others

..... Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL

Present: Mr. Tarang Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sourabh Goel, Sr. Standing counsel for respondents No. 1 & 3. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Punjab for respondent No.

2.

Mr. Rishabh Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No. 4 (through VC).

**** LISA GILL, J.

1.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that during pendency of this writ petition, final order under Sections 74 and 122 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 has been passed yesterday itself i.e. 08.12.2025, therefore, petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file afresh while challenging said order as well.

2.

Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned.

3.

It is clarified that there is no expressio

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.