Ms Naresh Kumar Enterprises vs. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP/15642/2026HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01083436202621 May 2026Bench: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Naresh Kumar Enterprises, filed a writ petition before the Punjab & Haryana High Court challenging an adjudication order dated 04.02.2025, passed by the respondent-State of Haryana and others. The core of the petitioner's grievance was that this order was passed without providing any opportunity for a personal hearing. The judgment does not specify the tax period or the amount in dispute. The procedural history leading to the adjudication order is not detailed, other than the fact that the impugned order was passed without a personal hearing.

Held

The Court held that the impugned adjudication order dated 04.02.2025 was passed without affording any opportunity of personal hearing to the assessee. This failure was found to be not only violative of the principles of natural justice but also a contravention of Section 75(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Consequently, the Court set aside the impugned adjudication order. As a result of setting aside the order, the Court directed the release of the petitioner's attached bank accounts. The Court also granted liberty to the respondent-State to proceed afresh against the petitioner in accordance with law. No issues were expressly left undecided.

Key Issues

1. Whether the impugned adjudication order dated 04.02.2025, passed by the respondent-State of Haryana, is violative of the principles of natural justice and Section 75(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, by being passed without affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner contended that the adjudication order was passed without granting them a personal hearing, which is a fundamental breach of natural justice principles and statutory provisions. The revenue or State did not record any specific arguments in opposition to this contention.

Sections Cited

Section 75(4)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

( Sr. No. 180 )

CWP No. 15642 of 2026

Date of decision: 21.05.2026

M/s Naresh Kumar Enterprises .....Petitioner

Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI

Present : Mr. Pryankur Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sourabh Goel, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

* * *

DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) (1)

It is not disputed that the impugned adjudication order dated 04.02.2025 (Annexure P-1) was passed without affording any opportunity of personal hearing to the assessee. (2)

In the light of the above, the impugned adjudication order is not only violative of the principles of natural justice but also contravenes Section 75(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Therefore, the impugned adjudication order dated 04.02.2025 (Annexure P-1) is set aside and as a result whereof the petitioner’s attached bank accounts shall be released. However, liberty is granted to the respondent-State to proceed afresh against the petitioner, in

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.