Krishna Traders vs. State Of Punjab And Others

CWP/22778/2026HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01121219202613 August 2026Bench: JUSTICE (TO BE NOMINATED),MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR2 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Krishna Traders, filed a writ petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Their grievance was that despite depositing the mandatory pre-deposit amount under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, to file an appeal, the respondent authorities had not de-frozen their bank account, which had been provisionally attached. The respondent authorities, represented by the learned State counsel, did not dispute the petitioner's factual assertions and assured the Court that the petitioner's account would be de-freezed within a week.

Held

The Court held that the respondent authorities were obligated to de-freeze the petitioner's bank account. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, for filing an appeal. The State counsel's admission that the account would be de-freezed within a week further supported this. The ratio decidendi is that statutory compliance with pre-deposit provisions for appeals necessitates the unfreezing of attached bank accounts. The Court directed the respondents to ensure the petitioner's bank account is de-freezed within one week from the date of the order.

Key Issues

1. Whether the respondent authorities are obligated to de-freeze the bank account of the petitioner once the requisite pre-deposit amount for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, has been deposited? (Question of law) Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that upon fulfilling the pre-deposit requirement for filing an appeal, the provisional attachment of their bank account should be lifted. They relied on the principle that compliance with statutory pre-deposit conditions should lead to the restoration of normal financial operations. Revenue/State's contention: The respondent authorities, while not disputing the facts, stated that they would de-freeze the account within a week, implying an acknowledgment of the obligation to do so upon compliance.

Sections Cited

Section 107

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

122

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-22778-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13th August, 2026. M/S. KRISHNA TRADERS

.…...Petitioner(s) V/s STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

.....Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR

Present Mr. Tarang Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

****

ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral)

1.

The limited grievance raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is that, despite having deposited the requisite pre-deposit amount as mandated under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, to file an appeal, the bank account of the petitioner, which had been provisionally attached/frozen by the respondent authorities, has not been de-frozen.

2.

Learned State counsel, who has appeared on advance notice, has obtained instructions in the matter does not dispute the factual assertions pleaded by the petitioner in the Writ Petition and states that the petitioner’s account will be de-freezed within a week.

3.

In view of the aforesaid statement made on behalf of

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.