Panchvati Charitable Trust vs. Union Of INDIA And Others

Original PDF →
CWP/18414/2025HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01098118202514 August 2026Bench: JUSTICE (TO BE NOMINATED),MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, Panchvati Charitable Trust, filed a writ petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court challenging the validity of service of a notice and an order-in-original. The petitioner contended that uploading these documents in the 'View Additional Notices and Orders' tab on the common GST portal (www.gst.gov.in) did not constitute proper service. The dispute centers on whether this method of uploading on the portal amounts to valid service under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The revenue authorities are the respondents. The tax period is not specified. The procedural history is limited to the filing of this writ petition.

Held

The Court held that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by previous judgments of this Court. Specifically, the Court referred to its decision in CWP-27139-2025, Luxmi Traders v. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others, which was further clarified by another judgment in CWP-15601-2026, The Amar Cooperative LC Society Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Others. The ratio decidendi from these prior judgments, which dealt with the validity of service of notices and orders through the GST portal, was applied. The Court found no reason to deviate from its established position. Consequently, the instant writ petition was disposed of in the same terms as the aforementioned judgments. The operative direction was to dispose of the petition in line with the precedents, implying that the petitioner's challenge would be decided based on those rulings. No specific amount in dispute was mentioned, and no issue was expressly left undecided.

Key Issues

1. Whether uploading of a notice and an order-in-original in the 'View Additional Notices and Orders' tab on the common GST portal (www.gst.gov.in) amounts to proper service on the petitioner, in view of Section 169 read with Section 146 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? The petitioner argued that such an upload does not constitute proper service. The revenue contended that uploading on the common portal is a valid mode of service. Both parties agreed that the issue is no longer res integra and has been decided by previous judgments of the High Court. The petitioner relied on the principles laid down in CWP-27139-2025, Luxmi Traders v. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others, and CWP-15601-2026, The Amar Cooperative LC Society Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Others. The revenue did not present any separate arguments, acknowledging the binding precedent.

Sections Cited

Section 169, Section 146

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

213 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18414-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.08.2026 PANCHVATI CHARITABLE TRUST ....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ….RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Mr. Mukul Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Sr. Standing Counsel, UOI, Ms. Geetika Sharma, Advocate, Ms. Himanshi Gautam, Advocate, and Ms. Drishti Saraf, Advocate for the respondents/Revenue. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Additional Standing Counsel, U.T. with Mr. Sachit Singla, Junior Standing Counsel, for the respondents/U.T. ***** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral)

1.

Short question that requires consideration in this writ petition is as to whether uploading of a notice as well as the order-in- original in the tab ‘View Additional Notices and Orders’, on the common portal, being www.gst.gov.in amounts to proper service of it, on the petitioner in view of Section 169 read with Section 146 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017?

2.

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present case is no longer res integra and stands concluded by the judgment of this Court in CWP-27139-2025, Luxmi Traders v. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others. The said judgment has been further clarified by MOHIT GOYAL 2026.08.20 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-18414-2025 (O&M)

2 this Court in CWP-15601-2026, The Amar Cooperative LC Society Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Others, decided on 23.07.2026. 3. As the issue raised in this case is squarely covered by the judgments rendered by this Court in Luxmi Traders (supra) as further clarified in The Amar Cooperative LC Society Ltd (supra), the instant writ petition is disposed of in the same terms.

4.

All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. [ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE [ROHIT KAPOOR]

JUDGE AUGUST 14, 2026 Mohit Goyal

1.

Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No 2. Whether Reportable Yes/No MOHIT GOYAL 2026.08.20 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.