Sidh Raj Jain vs. State Of Punjab And Another

Original PDF →
CWP/27311/2026HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01143207202626 August 2026Bench: JUSTICE (TO BE NOMINATED),MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, Sidh Raj Jain, filed a writ petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court challenging the validity of service of a notice and an order-in-original. The petitioner contended that uploading these documents in the 'View Additional Notices and Orders' tab on the GST portal (www.gst.gov.in) did not constitute proper service. The respondents were the State of Punjab and another authority. The tax period and the specific amount in dispute were not explicitly stated in the judgment. The procedural history involved the filing of this writ petition.

Held

The Court held that the issue raised in the present writ petition was squarely covered by its previous judgments in CWP-27139-2025, Luxmi Traders v. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others, and CWP-15601-2026, The Amar Cooperative LC Society Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Others. These judgments had clarified the position regarding the validity of service through the GST portal. The Court found no reason to deviate from its earlier pronouncements. Consequently, the instant writ petition was disposed of in the same terms as the aforementioned judgments. The operative direction was to dispose of the writ petition in line with the previous rulings, implying that the service, if effected in the manner described, was considered valid based on prior precedent. No specific issue was left undecided.

Key Issues

1. Whether uploading a notice and an order-in-original in the 'View Additional Notices and Orders' tab on the common GST portal amounts to proper service on the petitioner, in light of Section 169 read with Section 146 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? The petitioner argued that such an upload does not constitute proper service. The revenue or State did not present any arguments as the parties were ad idem that the issue was already decided by this Court. The petitioner relied on previous judgments of the High Court in CWP-27139-2025, Luxmi Traders v. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others, and CWP-15601-2026, The Amar Cooperative LC Society Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Others.

Sections Cited

Section 169, Section 146

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

144 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-27311-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26th August, 2026. SIDH RAJ JAIN

.…...Petitioner(s) V/s STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

......Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR

(Through Video Conference/Hybrid Mode)

Present Mr. Peyush Pruthi, Advocate, for the petitioner. (appeared through VC)

Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

****

ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral)

1.

Short question that requires consideration in this writ petition is as to whether uploading of a notice as well as the order-in- original in the tab ‘View Additional Notices and Orders’, on the common portal, being www.gst.gov.in amounts to proper service of it, on the petitioner in view of Section 169 read with Section 146 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017?

2.

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present case is no longer res integra and stands concluded by the judgment of this Court in CWP-27139-2025, Luxmi Traders v. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others. The said judgment has been further clarified by this Court in CWP-15601-2026, The Amar Cooperative LC Society Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Others, decided on 23.07.2026. SURESH KUMAR 2026.08.26 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-27311-2026 (O&M)

3.

As the issue raised in this case is squarely covered by the judgments rendered by this Court in Luxmi Traders (supra) as further clarified in The Amar Cooperative LC Society Ltd (supra), the instant writ petition is disposed of in the same terms.

4.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly.

[ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

[ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE

August 26, 2026 Ess Kay

Whether speaking / reasoned :

Yes / No Whether Reportable

:

Yes / No SURESH KUMAR 2026.08.26 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.