M/S Sood Expeller Industries vs. State Of Punjab And Others
Held
The Court held that the issue raised in the present writ petition was squarely covered by the judgments previously rendered by the High Court in CWP-27139-2025, Luxmi Traders v. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others, and further clarified in CWP-15601-2026, The Amar Cooperative LC Society Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Others. The Court did not provide a fresh analysis of the law or the facts of this specific case. Instead, it disposed of the instant writ petition in the same terms as the aforementioned judgments. The operative direction was to dispose of the writ petition in line with the prior rulings, implying that the relief granted or the findings on the issue of service would be consistent with those precedents. No issue was expressly left undecided.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s. Sood Expeller Industries, filed a writ petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court challenging the validity of service of a notice and an order-in-original. The petitioner contended that uploading these documents in the 'View Additional Notices and Orders' tab on the common GST portal (www.gst.gov.in) did not constitute proper service. The revenue, represented by the State of Punjab and others, was the respondent. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute were not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to this writ petition is not detailed.
Key Issues
1. Whether uploading of a notice as well as the order-in-original in the tab ‘View Additional Notices and Orders’, on the common portal, www.gst.gov.in amounts to proper service of it, on the petitioner in view of Section 169 read with Section 146 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? The petitioner argued that such uploading does not constitute proper service. The revenue did not present any specific arguments, but the Court noted that the parties were ad idem that the issue was concluded by previous judgments. The petitioner relied on the principles established in CWP-27139-2025, Luxmi Traders v. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others, and CWP-15601-2026, The Amar Cooperative LC Society Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Others.
Sections Cited
Section 169, Section 146
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
213 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-15235-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16th September, 2026. M/S. SOOD EXPELLER INDUSTRIES
.…...Petitioner(s) V/s STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
......Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR
Present Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate, and
Mr. Arvind Galav, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
****
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)
Short question that requires consideration in this writ petition is as to whether uploading of a notice as well as the order-in- original in the tab ‘View Additional Notices and Orders’, on the common portal, being www.gst.gov.in amounts to proper service of it, on the petitioner in view of Section 169 read with Section 146 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017?
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present case is no longer res integra and stands concluded by the judgment of this Court in CWP-27139-2025, Luxmi Traders v. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others. The said judgment has been further clarified by this Court in C
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.