Ms Blue Sky Exports Private Limited vs. State Of Haryana And Another
Held
The Court held that the issue raised in the present writ petition was squarely covered by its previous judgments in Luxmi Traders and The Amar Cooperative LC Society Ltd. Consequently, the instant writ petition was disposed of in the same terms as those prior judgments. While the specific findings of those prior judgments are not detailed in this excerpt, the implication is that the Court has previously ruled on the adequacy of service through the GST portal. The reasoning hinges on the principle of stare decisis, where the court follows its own precedents. The operative direction was to dispose of the writ petition in terms of the earlier judgments. No specific issue was left undecided, as the matter was considered concluded.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Blue Sky Exports Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court challenging the validity of service of a notice and an order-in-original. The petitioner contended that uploading these documents on the common GST portal under the tab ‘View Additional Notices and Orders’ did not constitute proper service. The respondents were the State of Haryana and another authority. The tax period and the specific order or action under challenge were not detailed in the provided text, nor was the amount in dispute. The procedural history leading to this writ petition was not elaborated upon.
Key Issues
1. Whether uploading a notice and an order-in-original in the tab ‘View Additional Notices and Orders’ on the common portal (www.gst.gov.in) amounts to proper service on the petitioner, in view of Section 169 read with Section 146 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? The petitioner argued that such an upload does not constitute proper service. The revenue or State did not present any specific arguments in the provided text, but the court noted that the parties were 'ad idem' (in agreement) that the issue was concluded by previous judgments. The court relied on its own prior decisions in CWP-27139-2025, Luxmi Traders v. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others, and CWP-15601-2026, The Amar Cooperative LC Society Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Others, decided on 23.07.2026.
Sections Cited
Section 169, Section 146
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
147 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-30429-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.09.2026 M/S BLUE SKY EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED ....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ….RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:- HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Mr. Ajay Singh Bhattian, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Addl. AG, Haryana. ***** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, C.J. (Oral)
Short question that requires consideration in this writ petition is as to whether uploading of a notice as well as the order-in- original in the tab ‘View Additional Notices and Orders’, on the common portal, being www.gst.gov.in amounts to proper service of it, on the petitioner in view of Section 169 read with Section 146 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017?
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present case is no longer res integra and stands concluded by the judgment of this Court in CWP-27139-2025, Luxmi Traders v. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others. The said judgment has been further clarified by this Court in CWP-15601-2026, The Amar Cooperative LC Society Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Others, decided on 23.07.2026.
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.