M/S. Vishwas Enterprises vs. The State Of Karnataka
Held
The Court noted the petitioner's submission that they wished to withdraw the writ petition to approach the Appellate Authority, as the impugned order was appealable under Section 107 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court accepted this submission and disposed of the writ petition, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the Appellate Authority. All contentions of the parties were kept open. The Court did not decide on the merits of the original challenge to the endorsement/order.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Vishwas Enterprises, filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court challenging an endorsement/order issued by the Commercial Tax Officer, Enforcement No. 2, dated October 19, 2020. The petitioner sought to quash this order, alleging it was erroneous, arbitrary, opposed to law, equity, and justice, and passed without jurisdiction. The respondents included the State of Karnataka and various Commercial Tax Officers. The petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
Key Issues
The primary issue was whether the endorsement/order issued by the Commercial Tax Officer, Enforcement No. 2, was legally sustainable. The petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the writ petition. The court had to decide whether to allow the withdrawal and grant liberty to approach the Appellate Authority. The petitioner argued that the impugned order was appealable under Section 107 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, implying they wished to pursue that statutory remedy. The revenue's arguments are not recorded in the judgment.
Sections Cited
Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 25T H DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
W.P.NO.148548/2020 (T-RES)
BETWEEN :
M/S VISHWAS ENTERPRISES, NO.75, 1S T FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD, HUBBALLI-580030, DHARWAD DISTRICT, REP. MANAGING PARTNER, SRI VENKANAGOUDA S.PATIL, AGE : 61 YEARS. .. PETITIONER (BY SHRI S.P.KULKARNI, ADV.)
AND :
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPT. OF COMMERCIAL TAX, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ENFORCEMENT NO.2, OFFICE OF JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, (ENFORCEMENT) NZ., CLUB ROAD, BELAGAVI.
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, (ENFORCEMENT NO.6), HUBLI.
M/S. LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES, PLOT NO.11, 1S T CROSS, II STAGE, KRISHNA COLONY,
2 RANI CHANNAMMA NAGAR, BELAGAVI. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI SHIVAPRABHU S.HIREMATH, AGA FOR R.1 TO R3) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING THIS COURT TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE ENDORSEMENT/ORDER ISSUED IN NO.CTO(ENF)- 2, BGV/NOTICE/20-21/B-679 DTD.19.10.2020 ISSUE
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.