M/S. Sbr Group vs. State Of Karnataka
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER
Learned HCGP accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a) “Issue the writ of Certiorari or in the nature of Certiorari to quash and set aside the impugned show cause notice bearing reference No.ACCT/AUDIT-5.8/DGSTO-08/ADJUDICATION /T.NO.131/SCN/2024-25 dated, 27.05.2024 issued by Respondent No.
No.1 (Annx-F).
b) Issue the writ of Certiorari or in the nature of Certiorari to quash and set aside the impugned the Order -In-Original bearing file no.ACCT/AUDIT-5.8/DGSTO- 05/ADJUDICATION/NO.39 /AO/2024-25 DTD. 30.08.2024 passed by Respondent No.2 (ANNX-H) HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24235 WP No. 35676 of 2024
and other consequential actions taken by Respondent No.2 in the case of the petitioner.
c) Alternatively remand the matter to the Order-In- Original stage, directing Respondent No.2 to adjudicate the proceedings afresh in accordance with law, after granting the petitioner a fair and effective opportunity to be heard and after considering all documents and records furnished.
d) Pass such other orders as this Hon’ble court may deem fir in the interest of justice.”
The petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy under Section 107 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Reserving such liberty, the petition stands disposed of. (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
KTY List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.