M/S.Harrisons Malayalam LTD. vs. State Of Kerala

Original PDF →
WP(C)/14445/2018HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01046033201808 May 2018Bench: HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN4 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF MAY 2018 / 18TH VAISAKHA, 1940 WP(C).No. 14445 of 2018 ----------------------- PETITIONER : ---------- M/S. HARRISONS MALAYALAM LTD.,24/1624, BRISTOW ROAD, WILLINGDON ISLAND, COCHIN-682 003. REPRESENTED BY ITS HEAD-TAXATION, MR. V.V.N PRABHU. BY ADVS.SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SRI.P.GOPINATH SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN SRI.KURYAN THOMAS SRI.PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM SRI.RAJA KANNAN RESPONDENTS : ----------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, VAT SPECIAL CIRCLE(PRODUCE), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (NOW STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT), MATTANCHERRY, ERNAKULAM-682 002. 3. THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, (NOW STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAXES DEPARTMENT), MATTANCHERRY, ERNAKULAM-682 002. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MANURAJ K.J. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-05-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: bp 09/5/2018 WP(C).No. 14445 of 2018 (E) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------- EXT.P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE ANNUAL RETURN (ORIGINAL) IN FORM 10 DATED 09/05/2012 FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2011 - 2012 UNDER THE KVAT ACT. EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 13 (AUDIT REPORT) AND FORM 13A (AUDITED STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS) DATED 30/01/2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2011 - 2012 UNDER THE KVAT ACT. EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE REVISED ANNUAL RETURN DATED 02/03/2013 FILED FOR THE YEAR 2011 - 2012 ALONG WITH THE COVERING LETTER, WITH PROOF OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY THE OFFICE OF 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE REFUND APPLICATION DATED 02/03/2013 ALONG WITH THE COVERING LETTER FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P5: A TRUE COPY OF THE REFUND ORDER DATED 02/12/2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P6: A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 02/05/2017 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 25 (1) OF THE KVAT ACT, FOR THE YEAR 2011 - 2012. EXT.P7: A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 07/02/2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 25(1) OF THE KVAT ACT, FOR THE YEAR 2011 - 2012. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY (WITHOUT ANNEXURES) DATED 17/05/2017, OBJECTING TO THE PROPOSALS IN EXT.P4 NOTICE. EXT.P9: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY (WITHOUT ANNEXURES) DATED 08/02/2018, OBJECTING TO THE PROPOSALS IN EXT.P5 NOTICE. EXT.P10: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER (WITHOUT ANNEXURES) DATED 23/02/2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT, WITH PROOF OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P11: A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF ASSESSMENT DATED 24/03/2018 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER THE KVAT ACT FOR THE YEAR 2011 - 2012. WP(C).No. 14445 of 2018 (E) --------------------------- EXT.P12: A TRUE COPY OF THE RECTIFICATION PETITION (WITHOUT ANNEXURES) DATED 10/04/2018 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P13: A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16/04/2018 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P14: A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 20/04/2018 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P15: COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 18/4/2018, ISSUED BY THE R3 FOR THE YEAR 2011-12. EXT.P16: COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 3/5/2018, SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE R3. EXT.P17: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27/4/2018, PASSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO. 14625/2018 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE bp 9/5/2018 ANU SIVARAMAN, J. ----------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No. 14445 of 2018 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of May, 2018

JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court challenging Exhibit P13 order issued on a rectification petition preferred by the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner was not heard before orders were passed.

2.

The learned Government Pleader would contend that the petitioner had been put on notice but had not appeared. Be that as it may, I am of the opinion that the request for rectification has to be considered in accordance with law and orders have to be passed after hearing the petitioner also.

3.

In the above view of the matter, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to take up, consider and pass orders on Exhibit P12 in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is submitted that a duly authorised representative of the petitioner shall be present before the 2nd respondent at 11 a.m. on 18.5.2018 for a hearing on the appeal. Coercive steps pursuant to Exhibits P11 and P13 shall be kept in abeyance till orders are passed as directed above. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE vgs8/5

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.