Aspirations Hospitality Services vs. Commercial Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
J U D G M E N T The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessment order, filed Ext.P2 appeal before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P2(a) stay application. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the stay application filed by the petitioner within a period of two months, after issuing notice to the petitioner. Till disposal of the stay application, all recovery proceedings based on the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE smp
W.P.(C) No.487/2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32071320753/2015-16 DATED 19.9.2016 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 AGAINST EXT.P1 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 26.12.2018. EXHIBIT P2(a)OF THE STAY PETITION FILED IN EXT. P2 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 26.12.2018. EXHIBIT P2(b)OF THE EARLY HEARING PETITION FILED IN EXT.P2 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 26.12.2018. EXHIBIT P3OF THE DEMAND NOTICE IN MALAYALAM ALONG WITH TRUE TRANSLATION IN ENGLISH IN FORM 1 BEARING RRC NO.2018/14117/07 DATED 7.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL.P.S to Judge smp
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.