Fine Fit Seat Covers And Accessories vs. The State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner, a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act (KVAT Act), 2003, on the rolls of the 1st respondent, has been facing the proceedings for the assessment year 2015-2016. It filed Ext.P2 statutory appeal along with a stay petition, besides a delay condonation petition. The delay is said to be 165 days. The petitioner complains that before the appellate forum could consider its interlocutory applications, the respondent authority is taking coercive steps.
This Court, after hearing the learned counsel on either side, disposes of this writ petition holding that the 2nd respondent will consider the interlocutory applications, including the delay condonation petition, at the earliest and pass orders, possibly, within one month. The respondent authority shall defer coercive steps until the 2nd respondent considers the interlocutory applications. DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE das
-3- W.P.(C). No. 883 of 2019 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26/09/2017 FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 05/07/2018 AGAINST EXT.P1. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE DELAY CONDONATION PETITION DATED 05/07/2018 IN EXT.P2 APPEAL. EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 05/07/2018.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.