Athira Gold And Silks vs. The State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner,
as against
Ext.P2 assessment order, filed Ext.P3 appeal before the second respondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P4 stay application. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P4 stay application within two months. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugned order in the appeal shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
WP(C).No. 1033 of 2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER DATED 28.4.2018 FOR THE YEAR 2013-14 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 19.11.2018 FOR THE YEAR 2013-14 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF APPEAL PETITION DATED 27.12.2018 AGAINST EXT. P1 EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 27.12.2018 IN EXT. P2 RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL. //// P.A.TO JUDGE ln
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.