Sevens Enterprises vs. State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
J U D G M E N T [ WP(C) 2366/2019 ,WP(C).2417/2019 ] In these writ petitions the petitioners have laid challenge, amongst others, on the ground that Section 174 of the KSGST Act is ultra vires of the State's legislative power or on the ground that the demand is barred by limitation under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act. In some cases, both the grounds have been taken.
In the light of the judgment in M/s. Sheen Golden Jewels (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Tax Officer (IB)-11 I dismiss these writ petitions. DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE jjj 1 Judgment dated 11.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No.11335/2018
W.P.(C) Nos.2366 & 2417/2019 -5- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 2366/2019 PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER KVAT ACT, FOR 2011-2012, DT. 28.3.2018. EXHIBIT P2OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SEC.7 OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY ACT, DATED 10.7.2018. W.P.(C) Nos.2366 & 2417/2019 -6- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 2417/2019 PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 02.07.2018, ISSUED TO PETITIONER BY 1ST RESPONDENT, UNDER SECTION 25(1) OF THE KVAT ACT FOR 2016-17. EXHIBIT P2OF PENALTY ORDER DATED 02.07.2018, ISSUED TO PETITIONER BY 1ST RESPONDENT, UNDER SECTION 67(1) OF THE KVAT ACT FOR 2016-17. EXHIBIT P3OF INTERIM ORDER DATED 04.04.2018 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION (C) NO.11335 OF 2018, IN STAYING FURTHER STEPS, ON THE FOOTING OF NOT HAVING LEGISLATIVE COMPLIANCE TO 1ST RESPONDENT AS ON THE DATE OF INITIATING PROCEEDINGS UNDER KVAT ACT 2003.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.