Team Developers vs. The State Of Kerala
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner approached the third respondent in an appeal. The petitioner already deposited 20% of the disputed tax.
In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the third respondent to consider the stay application within two months. Till then, recovery pursuant to the impugned order in the appeal shall be deferred.
The writ petition is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF ORDER DATED 27.07.2017 ISSUED BY THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (IB), ERNAKULAM. EXHIBIT P2OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3OF THE KVAT APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT NO. KL 0101106201718M DATED 24.01.2018 REMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL. //// P.A.TO JUDGE ln
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.