E.M.Ummer vs. The State Of Kerala
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner, an assessee under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act 2003, seeks the following reliefs; “i) to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction to quash Ext.P1 order passed by the 1st respondent as the same are beyond the period stipulated u/s 19 of the Constitution One Hundred and First Amendment Act. ii) to declare that when the provisions of Constitution are inconsistent with the provisions of a statute, the provisions of Constitution will prevail over the provisions of statute and so provisions of Section 174 of the Kerala Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 to the extent to which they are in conflict with the provisions of Constitution, are bad in law.”
Both the counsel agree that the issues stand squarely covered against the petitioner by a judgment dated 11th January 2019 in W.P. (C) No.11335 of 2018 and connected cases. I, therefore, dismiss the writ petition applying the ratio of the judgment referred to above. DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE das APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE ORDER NO. 32081015744/2016-17 DATED 22-11-2018
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.