Baiju A.A. vs. State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh as the petitioner sought to challenge the constitutional validity of the very amendment. Permission granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU SKA JUDGE
3 WP(C).No. 2579 of 2019 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE ANNUAL RETURN FOR 2011-12 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2OF THE NOTICE DATED 16.5.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3OF THE REPLY DATED 6.6.2018 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32072073096/2011-12 DATED 8.11.2018 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL //// PA TO JUDGE
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.