Al Fah Associates vs. The State Tax Officer-1
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
J U D G M E N T The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessment order, filed Ext.P2 appeal before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P3 stay application. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the stay application filed by the petitioner within a period of two months, after issuing notice to the petitioner. Till disposal of the stay application, all recovery proceedings based on the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE smp
W.P.(C) No.6986/2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 A COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 28.5.2018 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2011-12. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 28.2.2019 AGAINST EXT.P1. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 28.2.2019 IN EXT.P2 APPEAL RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL.P.S to Judge smp
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.