Royal Touch Ply vs. The State Of Kerala
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
J U D G M E N T The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessment order, filed Ext.P2 appeal before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P3 stay application. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the stay application filed by the petitioner within a period of two months, after issuing notice to the petitioner. Till disposal of the stay application, all recovery proceedings based on the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE smp
W.P.(C) No.6969/2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 AOF ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.321151350035/2015-16/CST DATED 31.01.2019 PASSED BY STATE TAX OFFICER-IIND CIRCLE, PERUMBAVOOR.(THE STATE TAX OFFICER- I, NORTH PARAVOOR,ON DEPUTATION TO SPECIAL TEAM, PERUMBAVOOR) FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 AOF APPEAL DATED 04.03.2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 AOF THE STAY PETITION DATED 04.03.2019 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH EXHIBIT P2 APPEAL RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL.P.S to Judge smp
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.