Bindhu Anantharaman vs. State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Petitioner aggrieved by an assessment order preferred an appeal before the 2nd respondent under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. There is also delay of about 21 days in filing the appeal. The petitioner also filed a stay application. There shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to dispose the application for condonation of delay and stay application within two months. Till then recovery proceedings based on the impugned order that shall be deferred. The writ petition is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE SPR
WP(C).No. 7423 of 2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE ORDER DATED 17.12.2018 COMPLETED U/S 25(1) OF THE KVAT ACT FOR THE YEAR 12-13 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT WITHOUT PROPER VERIFICATION EXHIBIT P2OF APPEAL DATED 11.2.2019 SUBMITTED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT. P1 ORDER EXHIBIT P3OF PETITION DATED 11.02.2019 FOR CONDONATION OF 21 DAYS DELAY IN FILING EXT. P2 APPEAL SUBMITTED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4OF STAY PETITION DATED 11.2.2019 SUBMITTED ALONG WITH EXT.P2 APPEAL BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5OF REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE IN FORM NO.1 ISSUED TO PETITIONER BY 3RD RESPONDENT, PURSUANT TO EXT.P1 DEMAND. RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.